I agree that it isn't very far, but it's definitely a lot further than the CVS is from the Brooks. And it's no longer "in" Davis Square. Leaving us with zero bookstores and two chain pharmacies.
A hotel? Well, it would certainly do well; at least that's not redundant.
Is this just inevitable evolution via market pressure? Is Davis Square as a place to live, except for a select elite, history? Does it even make sense to try to preserve affordable housing and green space, or is it like trying to hold back the tide?
My understanding of the hotel project is that the city government is trying to find a developer to put one up in Davis Square; the city thinks 100 rooms is what it needs, but they're waiting to hear what prospective developers say, so it could be smaller (though I think not bigger, given the zoning restrictions on height and such). I don't know the reasoning behind it, though.
Well, it's doggone difficult to find a hotel that's not either way the heck out, prohibitively expensive, or already full, so it seems like a workable idea. I'm just hoping they incorporate parking into their design...
Yes, they are requiring that the developer include parking (underground, because the sites they are considering are currently parking lots: the Day St. lot, the lot where the Rite Aid is, and a lot on Buena Vista). And I think it's not just hotel parking, but enough to make up for losing the surface parking, too, though I wonder if there might then be something funky re:security in that case.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-18 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-18 01:50 pm (UTC)Is this just inevitable evolution via market pressure? Is Davis Square as a place to live, except for a select elite, history? Does it even make sense to try to preserve affordable housing and green space, or is it like trying to hold back the tide?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-19 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-19 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-19 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-18 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-18 02:24 pm (UTC)