Somerville and gay marriage
May. 13th, 2004 12:37 pmAccording to WBZ-AM 1030 this morning, Somerville is going to be one of the town's that doesn't give a rat's ass about residency come May 17 and the legalization of gay marriage, joining the ranks of P-town and Cambridge (Boston seems to have wussed out). So people can come and get married with no questions or hassle.
Hooray!
Hooray!
no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 12:34 pm (UTC)Confused yet? I sure am... personally, I still think that the state and federal government should get out of the marriage business altogether. Either give NO ONE "mariage" licenses and give everyone "domestic partnership" (or whatver terminonogy you want to use) licenses (which I feel will probably be what ends up happenings somewhere down the road anyways) or make a definitive statement reminding the world that "civil marriage" and "marriage" are two entirely different states of being. It doesn't seem logical for the gornment to be involved in defending the "sanctity" of something.
I mean... would you really want your state senator to be involved in deciding what is and is not "sacred?"
wow.... I didn't mean to rant there on your thread. You might want to ask the state of NJ how it would deal with that, though (I might myself, now that my interest is peaked).
no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 12:45 pm (UTC)Actually I can't say I disagree. In my mind Marriage is religiously based. Therefore everyone should be considered in a Domestic Partnership and if they then want the religious tag also, they can have it but it should only apply to religious things, not FEDERAL or STATE LAW.
NJ is pretty liberal all things considered.
I would like to see everyone placed on a legally equal footing though. It is not like gay parents love their kids less, and in some cases might be better at the job.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 04:25 pm (UTC)