is now online, or pick up the paper edition and turn to page 3. Quite a long and detailed report, with a lot of attention paid to our LJ discussion.
(See also: earlier post about Somerville Journal article)
(See also: earlier post about Somerville Journal article)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 05:33 pm (UTC)(I'm not a lawyer. I'm sure you could contact the DA office to learn more about rights and responsibilities of being a victim and witness in a criminal case).
I would assume the papers needed more investigation before running a story rather than report on something which could have come from any crackpot on the internet. In other words, there's no easy way you can positively prove that "scottdn" on LJ was the victim in this case. You'll notice the stories use "alleged victim" and "man who claims he's the victim" in the story. I'm glad they contacted the police department to learn more and I'm also glad and thankful they chose to keep my real name out of the stories.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-23 07:30 pm (UTC)