air conditioners
Jun. 16th, 2004 04:31 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
if you're thinking about buying an in-window air conditioner this year, this may be a good time to do it. i was at the Somerville Home Despot (sic) this morning, and they had Maytag 6000 BTU air conditioners with remote control for $120. no kidding.
i didn't check the energy efficiency rating, and at that price i expect it's not high, but at that price, it'll take a few years before the electric bill exceeds your savings. a couple weeks ago i saw 6000 BTU air conditioners at Economy Hardware in Central Square for $200.
after the summer five or six years ago when i gladly paid $350 for a 5000 BTU air conditioner -- the last one sears had in stock -- seeing $120 just makes my jaw drop. :-)
if you are getting an AC, i suggest getting one with a real thermostat, rather than "hi-med-low" settings. last year i replaced my old one with a Kenmore with an electronic thermostat. being able to set it to (say) 75 degrees and forget it is great -- it doesn't run all the time, thus using less energy. ones with timers to turn them off (for going to sleep) are nice, too.
anyway. saw the $120 unit and now i'm babbling ... :-)
i didn't check the energy efficiency rating, and at that price i expect it's not high, but at that price, it'll take a few years before the electric bill exceeds your savings. a couple weeks ago i saw 6000 BTU air conditioners at Economy Hardware in Central Square for $200.
after the summer five or six years ago when i gladly paid $350 for a 5000 BTU air conditioner -- the last one sears had in stock -- seeing $120 just makes my jaw drop. :-)
if you are getting an AC, i suggest getting one with a real thermostat, rather than "hi-med-low" settings. last year i replaced my old one with a Kenmore with an electronic thermostat. being able to set it to (say) 75 degrees and forget it is great -- it doesn't run all the time, thus using less energy. ones with timers to turn them off (for going to sleep) are nice, too.
anyway. saw the $120 unit and now i'm babbling ... :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 02:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 02:12 pm (UTC)the rational way to solve this is: find out how many watts your AC uses (probably in the manual or on the package, as the max rating). then multiple that by hours of operation per month, then divide by 1000, and you have kilowatt-hours. check your electric bill for your rate per KW/h, and multiply. that's your cost of operation.
one feature i like about mine -- there's a "sleep" mode. every 30 minutes (i think) it increases the temperature setting by one degree. your body temperature drops as you sleep, so it makes sense -- and again, saves some energy. combine this with a timer to turn it off, and you can be cool when you go to sleep, yet not be frozen by morning.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 04:31 pm (UTC)