save the willow tree in Davis sq!
Nov. 12th, 2008 02:29 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
There's a wonderful icon in Davis Sq that may die- please help!
There's a historic willow tree at the end of Thorndike Street in Davis sq that is planning to be cut down. There were enough people standing around this tree this morning that stopped Cambridge Landscaping to continue chopping it down. The land is owned by Joe Benoit. The landscaping company is planning on returning next week to try again. The tenants and neighbors are starting a petition...we only have one week to see what we can do. Can you help spread the word?
We have created an email address for people to chime in...."Save the Willow" savethewillow@gmail.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SaveTheTh orndikeWillow
The page has a good picture of the tree, with the landscaping truck parked in front.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 07:41 pm (UTC)Is this the willow tree that Deborah Henson-Conant sings about in "Belinda" ?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 07:47 pm (UTC)...Cambridge Landscaping is a private company. Not the city of Cambridge.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Moderator note
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 07:43 pm (UTC)Moderator note: don't screen comments, please
Date: 2008-11-12 07:44 pm (UTC)Specifically, you need to edit this post and change "Comment Screening" to "Journal Default".
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 07:54 pm (UTC)http://web.mit.edu/boojum/Pix/Neighborhood/Tree/
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:01 pm (UTC)It's probably too late to put anything in tomorrow's newspaper, but she could blog about it.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:06 pm (UTC)She said she would blog it.
:)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:07 pm (UTC)Contacting alderman-at-large Jack Connelly might be useful as well.
(I saw the people this morning while biking by on caravan, and thought to myself that it kinda looked like folks were standing there to save the tree from something, but I was still surprised to find out at the office that that was in fact what was happening.)
THIRD moderator note
Date: 2008-11-12 08:08 pm (UTC)Re: THIRD moderator note
Date: 2008-11-12 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:18 pm (UTC)while i know that sometimes an old enough building is capable of being protected (sometimes against the owners wishes and interests); and some towns can certify certain trees as "speshul"... it's not too common.
the best thing is probably to find the tree huggers association, okay, "preservation society" of appropriate need and have at it.
on the flip side, if the owners of that property ever have that tree fall and crush things, they'd be liable i'd gather. they may also not want that, and it IS their tree and responsibility.
goodluck!
#
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 06:22 am (UTC)Re: THIRD moderator note
Date: 2008-11-12 08:24 pm (UTC)Re: THIRD moderator note
Date: 2008-11-12 08:26 pm (UTC)Re: THIRD moderator note
From:Re: THIRD moderator note
From:Re: THIRD moderator note
From:Re: THIRD moderator note
From:Re: THIRD moderator note
From:Re: THIRD moderator note
From:Re: THIRD moderator note
From:Re: THIRD moderator note
From:Re: THIRD moderator note
From:FTW
From:Re: THIRD moderator note
From:Re: THIRD moderator note
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:39 pm (UTC)Meanwhile, what i came here to say was, this tree plot is remarkably like The Virgin Suicides!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:<3
From:Re: <3
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:save the willow!
Date: 2008-11-12 09:07 pm (UTC)The tree is being torn down supposedly because it is a safety issue, but the evidence for this is unfounded and more likely the entire destruction of the tree is unneccesary. The property owner is taking the appropriate steps by halting the tree cutting to reassess with an arborist the health and affect of the tree.
Re: save the willow!
Date: 2008-11-12 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 09:08 pm (UTC)And this is why there are Libertarians.
Date: 2008-11-14 06:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 09:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 09:19 pm (UTC)Okay. Someone has a pretty tree on their property, they are planning to cut the tree down, and you would like them not to have it cut down.
What are you offering the property owner as an alternative? If people in the neighborhood love the tree, perhaps taking up a collection to fund other ways of dealing with the issues the tree may be causing would be a positive gesture.
Emails from strangers don't seem to be a particularly helpful intervention. Support for finding alternative means of addressing the issues from neighbors? That would be a helpful intervention.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 09:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:One more voice in the fray
Date: 2008-11-12 09:59 pm (UTC)I truly hope there's a way to keep the tree. I've often admired it and feel that it simply makes the city a better place.
I would be very interested to hear the negative impacts of the tree; perhaps there might be good ways to mitigate these and preserve the tree.
I completely understand that it is on private property. I own property too and I know that personally I care about my neighbor's opinions and the effect of my actions on my community.
I hope the owners of 23 Thorndike reconsider their choice.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 12:03 am (UTC)It only takes a hairline crack in the pipe to attract the tree roots, which will eventually push into the pipes and block them completely. Because the length of the tree roots can be more than twice or even four times the height of the tree, the roots can spread almost a block underground. There is often plenty of air in sewer pipes, so the roots grow above the water line, feeding off the water vapor. By the time they have spread enough to cause pipe blockage, they have also extended far down the pipeline, and hundreds of feet of pipe needs to be ripped up. That's why the damage from tree roots is so expensive to fix.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 12:34 am (UTC)No. No way.
I am sick to death of busybody resident groups deciding it's a great idea to force innocent land owners to do what the group wants with the land owner's property instead of what the owner wants to. I want no part of it. As long as they're obeying all relevant laws, it's none of our business.
you don't own space, nasa owns space!
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 01:12 am (UTC)http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SaveTheThorndikeWillow
The page has a good picture of the tree, with the landscaping truck parked in front.
(Ellie, do you want to edit this link into your post?)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 01:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: