Question

Mar. 8th, 2009 11:30 pm
[identity profile] sonofabish.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] davis_square
Does anybody know how much money the city of Somerville is paying out in attorney's fees/etc to continue this ridiculous lawsuit over airplane noise?

I ask this because in these harsh economic times, it seems to be a less than wise expenditure of money.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

50 M, I think. Is that too much?

Date: 2009-03-09 03:32 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-03-09 04:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenala.livejournal.com
Gah, that's really going forward at the city level? I had thought it was just some silly activist type group with nothing better to do...

Date: 2009-03-09 04:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneagain.livejournal.com
Sound can be a pretty invasive issue; some folk deal with it better than others...

Date: 2009-03-09 05:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenala.livejournal.com
I understand that, certainly--I'm sensitive to some noise, like drunken idiots or late-night parties, say--but planes are always background noise to me. What I don't get is why plane noise should be any different from heating oil trucks or garbage pick-up or lawnmowers/snowblowers or half a dozen other things that are to some degree useful enough to be worth putting up with.

Also, planes are hardly unlimited in where they can go:
http://www.wired.com/cars/futuretransport/magazine/17-03/ff_airspace
"the Federal Aviation Administration treats each plane as if it were a 2,000-foot-tall, 6- by 6-mile block lumbering through the troposphere"

Boston has an airport that can basically only be reached from most of the US by crossing over densely populated areas of the metro area. I would hope that the decision of which particular densely populated areas to fly over would be based on a combination of time, resource use, and safety concerns, rather than which people on the ground whine the loudest. Somerville is narrow enough that pretty much any plane that can be heard from the city is almost certainly also noticeable in Cambridge or Medford or both, and possibly even louder. Those planes passing over Davis Square can also be heard from Harvard Square.

Not nearly enough.

Date: 2009-03-09 05:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dent42.livejournal.com
Seriously, I've lived here before and since they opened that new damned runway, and the noise went up seriously once it was built, despite numerous promises they wouldn't have flight paths over Somerville. I swear some days there's one every 30 seconds. If they treat those things like 6 mile blocks, then they're digging 4 miles trenchs through the city of Somerville.

Date: 2009-03-09 06:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prunesnprisms.livejournal.com
Counter to previous poster, too much? I would rather they fix roads and staff the somerville libraries.

Re: Not nearly enough.

Date: 2009-03-09 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
despite numerous promises they wouldn't have flight paths over Somerville.

Can you cite any legally binding contracts to that effect?

Re: Not nearly enough.

Date: 2009-03-09 11:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-lisa-ma.livejournal.com
Same promises they made in public meetings in Chelsea, et. al., before they opened the new runway. Might take a while, but some of can prob find the background.

Date: 2009-03-09 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] georgy.livejournal.com
Actually, Logan would only have transatlantic flights that wake up no one except the fishes :-)

Date: 2009-03-09 11:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ukelele.livejournal.com
I don't get it either (and also tend to think occasional plane noise is one of the tradeoffs for the privilege of living near an airport), but apparently a lot of people don't process it as background noise.

Date: 2009-03-09 11:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ukelele.livejournal.com
The transatlantic flights spend some time over the city on landing, and maybe on takeoff as well.

Date: 2009-03-09 11:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] georgy.livejournal.com
Yes, I more or less know that. Was trying to extract humor from this tired old debate :-)

Date: 2009-03-09 12:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] m00n.livejournal.com
Agreed. I don't want to hear about a single city employee who has to be laid off because of this thing.

Date: 2009-03-09 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talonvaki.livejournal.com
Seriously. I can think of a lot more, better uses for money than this stupid battle that can't be won...

Date: 2009-03-09 01:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] balsamicdragon.livejournal.com
Sorry to devil's advocate, but the lawsuit may be a good investment. Fewer planes flying overhead = higher property values in Somerville = higher real estate taxes = more money for the city. Plus, if the lawsuit is already underway, it would be a huge waste to just abandon it. Better to try to settle with the airports, make some sort of deal that ends the lawsuit but reduces the number of planes.

Date: 2009-03-09 01:33 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ron_newman
What I'm getting from all the posts on this subject is that the amount of noise varies greatly from one place to another, even in our small city. I'd love to know why. The noise does not bother me at Orchard and Day streets, but apparently it's unbearable in other areas just a few blocks away.
Edited Date: 2009-03-09 01:34 pm (UTC)

Exactly....

Date: 2009-03-09 01:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nvidia99999.livejournal.com
I'd say that anyone who does not own property in Somerville should just STFU on this issue.

Re: Not nearly enough.

Date: 2009-03-09 01:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
As this community has so recently seen, promises by one group to another about their business practices aren't always kept, and, usually, the promise breakers cite exigent circumstances.

Date: 2009-03-09 01:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
It doesn't bug me on the top of Ten Hills.

Date: 2009-03-09 01:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bobobb.livejournal.com
I'm not sure, but I live closer to Ball square and my house gets shaken to the gills at 5am on some mornings when the planes are coming in. My first night here after moving in I almost put the house back on the market. After a couple days though I got used to it, rarely hear it any more.

Date: 2009-03-09 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tt02144.livejournal.com
FYI....if you're looking to curtail all of the 'less than wise expenditures of money' by the city, you could be buried in paperwork for a thousand years!
And I do believe that the 'whiners' who complain about the airplane noise don't do it when they are flying in or out of Logan Airport.
Forget the lawsuit, it can't and won't change. People want convenience, i.e., their choice of 40 flights a day to NY and 25 to Washington D.C. There's nowhere else for the planes to go.

Date: 2009-03-09 02:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kennygster.livejournal.com
The noise is bad where I am. It is especially unbearable in the summer when the windows are open and it is hard to enjoy our yard when the planes are constantly going overhead (can't hold a conversation without being interrupted).

The FAA was not truthful with Somerville when it built the runway and I am glad that Somerville is standing up to them. I don't know the exact cost but a couple $ per person (~75k residents in Somerville) does not seem like a high price to pay for a better quality of life.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78 910
11121314151617
181920212223 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 08:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios