I'm in a bitchy mood today, but maybe people should think about these things first before they buy a house near a major square. I'm so sick of the not in my backyard mentality. venting over.
But when they bought the house, closing time was at 1 am. The city changing it to 2 am is not something the homeowner could necessarily expect to occur in the future.
Well, yes and no. All of Boston is 2am and that is a known fact. I just think that people need to remember they live in a city. Again, I'm just being a bit bitchy about it, but my initial reaction is they need to quit their whining, same with the whole Golden Light drama, and the airplane noise.
Yeah, I don't think that homeowners should have necessarily anticipated the possible change in bartime, but if someone is really sensitive about noise, then that should be taken into account when choosing a place to live. Either that, or be willing to accept that the convenience of living in a major square comes with the cost of dealing with the unpleasant aspects of said square.
and really, i think the majority of people that wouldn't be okay with an extra hour of 'noise' on the weekend, probably weren't crazy about noise at 1am either.
Well, yes and no. All of Boston is 2am and that is a known fact.
But this isn't Boston. I can see how someone who bought a house ten years ago near a bar that closed at 1 a.m. wouldn't be concerned that that time would change anytime soon.
That's true, though I can't imagine somebody who was concerned about bar noise living near a bar in the first place and/or being ok with the noise, whether the noise was at 1 or 2. Which isn't to say it doesn't happen or that homeowners should be expected to anticipate changes.
But I still think that, when weighing that against the revenue that gets kicked to Boston bars and the drunk driving that inevitably occurs between Boston and Somerville, essentially moving the noise up an hour (not necessarily increasing the noise) is an adjustment that can be made without turning someone who was ok with 1 AM noise into someone who's not ok with 2 AM noise.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-15 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-15 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-15 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-15 05:16 pm (UTC)Yeah, I don't think that homeowners should have necessarily anticipated the possible change in bartime, but if someone is really sensitive about noise, then that should be taken into account when choosing a place to live. Either that, or be willing to accept that the convenience of living in a major square comes with the cost of dealing with the unpleasant aspects of said square.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-15 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-15 10:55 pm (UTC)But this isn't Boston. I can see how someone who bought a house ten years ago near a bar that closed at 1 a.m. wouldn't be concerned that that time would change anytime soon.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-16 12:09 am (UTC)But I still think that, when weighing that against the revenue that gets kicked to Boston bars and the drunk driving that inevitably occurs between Boston and Somerville, essentially moving the noise up an hour (not necessarily increasing the noise) is an adjustment that can be made without turning someone who was ok with 1 AM noise into someone who's not ok with 2 AM noise.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-17 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-15 05:10 pm (UTC)