The Somerville Chamber of Commerce has just posted a notice regarding some rather strident rule changes apparently implemented by the Traffic and Parking Commission last Thursday. There's no effective date as of yet, nor any official announcement from the City, although these items are all on the official agenda from last Thursday's meeting.
Full details (in PDF form) are here: http://www.somervillechamber.org/news_images/5_25_09/09newparkingregs.pdf
Highlights of the changes include:
Full details (in PDF form) are here: http://www.somervillechamber.org/news_images/5_25_09/09newparkingregs.pdf
Highlights of the changes include:
- implementation of "Residential Permit Parking on all public streets in the City of Somerville Monday through Saturday, 24 hours"
- extension of meter hours to 10:00 PM in Davis Square and Magoun Square
- extension of meter hours to 8:00 PM in all other parts of Somerville
- a 100% increase in meter rates from $0.50/hr to $1.00/hr
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 09:51 pm (UTC)If they extend the effective hours of meters I hope they also extend the amount of time you can feed the meter at once (to at least 4 hours instead of the current 2 or 3).
I also don't understand why the Traffic and Parking Commission thinks these changes would be good for either residents or businesses. The Board of Aldermen should consider overruling them or at least delaying them for more public input.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 09:57 pm (UTC)http://www.thesomervillenews.com/main.asp?SectionID=2&SubSectionID=2&ArticleID=670&TM=10778.43
I really just don't understand the logic. Except, of course, the familiar quest for revenue.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 09:59 pm (UTC)no non-permit parking??
Date: 2009-05-26 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:01 pm (UTC)Well, that was the will of the people living on the street about ten years ago. Maybe it's changed since then, but I have not seen anybody trying to get actual information.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:01 pm (UTC)Re: no non-permit parking??
Date: 2009-05-26 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:22 pm (UTC)But the rest of that document is total bunk. If I still lived in Somerville, I'd be calling my aldercritter immediately.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:34 pm (UTC)Yeah, I know- we'll be issued 2 guest permits an address. Well, most of my friends live elsewhere and now, if I want to have a party, what do my friends do? Only 2 of them get permits. Is the city going to establish guest lots? Or if we have more than the city-sanctioned number of guests, those in excess will end up with $50 or $100 tickets? Or will they have to take the T and they have to leave relatively early?
You know, there's been these outreach plans for citizens to weigh in on issues and it seemed like, especially when it comes to parking, that the city was finally pulling its head out of its ass and at least putting forth the appearance of listening to people. But for the city to do this without asking for input, it's really outrageous. If this goes through and I am still in Somerville the next election, I'm immediately voting against every incumbent.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:48 pm (UTC)http://www.somervillema.gov/section.cfm?org=traffic&page=916
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:56 pm (UTC)No overnight parking anywhere on the streets.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:57 pm (UTC)8 is already late enough to discourage commuters from taking the spot for the entire night. But 10 would discourage people from going out to dinner or a movie in the square.
15 minutes per quarter is ridiculous too. Parts of Cambridge have this, and it discourages shopping in the area. Just last week I wanted to pop into the Galleria for something, had to keep watching my time cause only had three quarters in my pocket.
And we need a few non-permit streets as a "safety valve" of sorts for unexpected visitors and whatnot.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:03 pm (UTC)We do more than 75% of our business after 6pm and while realistically most of our customers don't have to or choose to drive, enough of them do to make a difference in our bottom line. I am sure, especially given the economy, many restaurants are barely making it - and losing 5% or 10% of their business because Davis is the only place with late night meters is going to hurt these places in a big way - nobody is making that high of a profit margin that they can kiss 5-10% goodbye.
Add to that for us personally it would be tough for people to have to leave their movies or concerts in the middle to feed the meters - and some artists have a no re-admittance policy that would further complicate things.
As for the permit parking - I think it is a major misstep forcing all streets into permit only. A lot of dissatisfied voters out there with something that effects 50% of the streets.
I will add that the Aldermen do not vote on this - it is the traffic commission, all of whom are appointed I believe. I complained to Rebekah Gewirtz as soon as I heard about this and she very kindly went to the commission meeting and plead our case to them - and she called me back immediately and was very understanding about how this would effect us and others - but she doesn't vote in this situation, she only represents her constituents.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:10 pm (UTC)This is also the case in the entire city of Providence. Not like anyone actually lives there.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:13 pm (UTC)I especially like the little bit that:
Please be advised that new parking regulations were passed by the Traffic & Parking Commission and do not require Board of Aldermen approval. The new regulations are subject to possible review by a three-member Traffic Board.
WTF????? Not subject to review by the Alderman???
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:19 pm (UTC)If people move into those areas, they do so willingly and understand that this is part of living in that particular neighborhood. Maybe folks don't view the whole having to pay a buck a car and spend time out of their day so they can invite friends over to be that big a hassle.
It so happens, I do view it as a big hassle and for an appointed board to single-handedly decide to change this AND claim the Aldermen have no power to change the decision.... sorry, that's bullshit and I hope the Aldermen stand up and reassert some semblence of control.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:25 pm (UTC)The "three person committee" with review powers mentioned in the CoC press release appears to be composed of Aldermen Trane, Roche, and Pero.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:31 pm (UTC)Their "logic" reminds me of the small town I lived in up in NH. About 20 years ago, they decided to put up the first set of traffic lights in town. They put them up and wired everything, but then they didn't activate them for a month- just left them blinking. The reason, according to one member of the Town Council, was "to give residents a chance to get used to them." And honest to gawd, all I could think was that they were scared it would be like when the cavemen first saw fire: "what is this strange thing"?
So, yeah, we better have 6-8 years to "get used" to the idea of parking permits.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 11:40 pm (UTC)So much for Freedom of Association. How much cash do you have, Jack?