FYI - this was just posted to the Arts Council list, and as a strong proponent of keeping music in the schools I call it to your attention:
Music in Schools
Posted by: jennifercapuano
Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:55 am (PDT)
Hello,
I'm writing to alert you to a bill (House No. 111 Requiring the Sterilization of Musical Instruments in Schools) which would require that any musical wind instrument provided by any school, public or private, to students in grades pre-K-12 be thoroughly sterilized prior to each student's use. This means not just sterilizing the mouth piece (which Somerville schools already do), but sterilizing the entire instrument by taking it to a certified facility (each time, prior to every use) where it is blasted with a gas used to sterilize medical equipment.
At a minimum cost to Somerville Public Schools of $70,000 per year to sterilize music instruments, this requirement would end wind instrument instruction and band programming in our public schools.
There are bacteria and pathogens throughout our schools. Are we going to start sterilizing all shared equipment? How about books, pencils, computers, sports equipment, art supplies? Musical instruments are not medical equipment. While sharing an instrument may increase the risk of certain illnesses, according to the article that ran in 6/4/09 issue of Boston Globe, there is "a lack of diagnosed cases." Band leaders, music instructors and directors find it unnecessary.
Despite severe budget cuts, Somerville's music program has been retained in the current school budget rounds. Under Music Director Richard Saunders' leadership, participation in the Somerville High School band has more than doubled over the last two years and middle school signups for instrument instruction have increased in many schools. Passage of this bill would end all of this.
I urge you to contact your legislators to vote against House No. 111 and keep music instruction growing in Somerville.
Best regards,
Jen Capuano
Healey and Capuano School parent
Music in Schools
Posted by: jennifercapuano
Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:55 am (PDT)
Hello,
I'm writing to alert you to a bill (House No. 111 Requiring the Sterilization of Musical Instruments in Schools) which would require that any musical wind instrument provided by any school, public or private, to students in grades pre-K-12 be thoroughly sterilized prior to each student's use. This means not just sterilizing the mouth piece (which Somerville schools already do), but sterilizing the entire instrument by taking it to a certified facility (each time, prior to every use) where it is blasted with a gas used to sterilize medical equipment.
At a minimum cost to Somerville Public Schools of $70,000 per year to sterilize music instruments, this requirement would end wind instrument instruction and band programming in our public schools.
There are bacteria and pathogens throughout our schools. Are we going to start sterilizing all shared equipment? How about books, pencils, computers, sports equipment, art supplies? Musical instruments are not medical equipment. While sharing an instrument may increase the risk of certain illnesses, according to the article that ran in 6/4/09 issue of Boston Globe, there is "a lack of diagnosed cases." Band leaders, music instructors and directors find it unnecessary.
Despite severe budget cuts, Somerville's music program has been retained in the current school budget rounds. Under Music Director Richard Saunders' leadership, participation in the Somerville High School band has more than doubled over the last two years and middle school signups for instrument instruction have increased in many schools. Passage of this bill would end all of this.
I urge you to contact your legislators to vote against House No. 111 and keep music instruction growing in Somerville.
Best regards,
Jen Capuano
Healey and Capuano School parent
no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 02:48 pm (UTC)...Oh wait.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-12 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-12 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 02:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 04:26 pm (UTC)Sterilizing the inside of the instrument, as opposed to the mouthpiece, is rather stupid. You don't come into contact with the scarier parts of a saxophone unless you're licking the tubing.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 05:59 pm (UTC)This is a stupid bill. If you're that paranoid about instruments, buy a few extra mouthpieces and let the kids use them all year, returning them at the end of the year for a big sterilization.
However, doesn't that sort of sterilization have the possibility of destroying things like Sax/Clarinet/Flute/etc pads? So that you'd have to replace all the pads on each hole every year?
no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 06:16 pm (UTC)No, seriously. I just finished a master's program in public health. How much time do you suspect we spent on the epidemic of band-instrument-transmitted disease during that program?
For those of you who guessed "None", give yourself the prize of your choice. This is a solution looking for a problem. And a dentist looking for a paycheck, it sounds like.
Does anyone know whether this bill has a chance in hell of passing?
no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 06:53 pm (UTC)The dentist's name is Lorenzo Lepore... you can see his political contribution record here:
http://www.efs.cpf.state.ma.us
Search on his contributions from Medford. You'll notice that it includes multiple members of the commission who recommended this bill.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 10:57 pm (UTC)And it seems that Medford High School has been doing this since the fall of 2006:
http://www1.whdh.com/features/articles/healthcast/BO28249/
no subject
Date: 2009-06-11 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-12 01:57 am (UTC)W.T.F.?