Ashley Taylor at the SN chickened out.
Jul. 29th, 2009 02:13 pmRemember this "reporter" from a few days ago? She bugged us for opinions about the Davis Sq Wheel. Well, obviously, we did not provide the kind of materials and objective evidence the Somerville News was looking for: www.thesomervillenews.com/main.asp . Everybody loves the Wheel, apparently... Good job, Ashely Taylor, one day FOX News may hire you.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 06:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:James Norton again!
Date: 2009-07-29 06:42 pm (UTC)Re: James Norton again!
From:Re: James Norton again!
From:Re: James Norton again!
From:Re: James Norton again!
From:Re: James Norton again!
From:Re: James Norton again!
From:Re: James Norton again!
From:Re: James Norton again!
From:Re: James Norton again!
From:Re: James Norton again!
From:Re: James Norton again!
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 06:38 pm (UTC)OTOH, he IS creepy.
Well well...
Date: 2009-07-29 06:41 pm (UTC)Re: Well well...
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 06:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 06:43 pm (UTC)Is it illegal to paint graffiti
Date: 2009-07-29 06:48 pm (UTC)Re: Is it illegal to paint graffiti
Date: 2009-07-29 07:10 pm (UTC)Further, while he says "please don't answer the questions" that's awfully goddamned self-centered of him and I think anyone who feels as though they have good answers ought to be giving them. (if what qualifies him to give advice on a card is that he's the one who set up the wheel, I figure our ideas of what qualifies someone to give advice are pretty screwed up.)
Re: Is it illegal to paint graffiti
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 08:15 pm (UTC)Oh She totally was paying attention
Date: 2009-07-29 08:28 pm (UTC)(yes, I'm entirely kidding around)
Re: Oh She totally was paying attention
Date: 2009-07-29 08:34 pm (UTC)Re: Oh She totally was paying attention
From:Re: Oh She totally was paying attention
Date: 2009-07-29 10:25 pm (UTC)Her fact checking doesn't even rise to 'crappy'. And that SN published it when that is *easily* found (indeed, in a conversation at Diesel last night about him, every person there knew the Turbine connection) speaks...well. it pretty much says all that needs be said.
Re: Oh She totally was paying attention
From:Re: Oh She totally was paying attention
From:yes, I did chicken out
Date: 2009-07-29 11:21 pm (UTC)Thank you for answering my post asking what you thought of Wheel Questions.
After I posted to the DS LiveJournal, I told my assignment editor, Bobbie, what I had found out about John Monsarrat's dark side. She wanted to check back with Jamie Norton and see what he thought about using blogs for reporting and about including Monsarrat’s dark side in the story. Because Jamie didn't respond with an opinion before my deadline, I decided that the best thing to do was pretend I'd never posted to the blog and write the story as I did.
Bobbie had warned me that this technique might fail, since you are the people who read the Somerville News. She was wiser than me. That's why they call me an intern.
Worried about the response I might get if I included Monsarrat's dark side in the story, I tried to avoid doing so by centering the story around people's responses to the Wheel, not around Monsarrat. Unfortunately, I failed. I agree that your response to Monsarrat can't be separated from your response to the Wheel, so an article about how people view the Wheel should include how they view its creator.
For your information, journalists at the Globe (http://www.boston.com/ae/theater_arts/articles/2009/07/24/wheel_questions_installation_offers_advice_and_inspiration/), the Somerville News before me , and the Phoenix also wrote stories about the wonderful Wheel without mentioning John Monsarrat's dark side. Their stories were about how Monsarrat turned his life around and started the Wheel, but they didn’t mention the Match-Up scheme of 2003 or Kink101. They chickened out, too, but less obviously than I did: they didn’t request the background information on-line, then ignore it.
Perhaps the Wheel helped Monsarrat to change since the Match-Up debacle several year's before the Wheel's founding. Or maybe not. But a better reporter would have posed the question to him.
Re: yes, I did chicken out
Date: 2009-07-29 11:48 pm (UTC)Monsarrat's Answer: "Absolutely! Wanna have dinner with me to find out, -wink wink?"
Seriously, we are not mean bastards, mostly having fun while waiting for the Recovery. :-)
The Recovery.
From:Re: The Recovery.
From:Re: yes, I did chicken out
Date: 2009-07-30 02:48 pm (UTC)Re: yes, I did chicken out
Date: 2009-07-30 06:27 pm (UTC)Re: yes, I did chicken out
From:Re: yes, I did chicken out
From:Re: yes, I did chicken out
Date: 2009-07-30 08:45 pm (UTC)Re: yes, I did chicken out
Date: 2009-07-30 11:12 pm (UTC)Aside, I'm also curious when he threw in the H to make his name "John".
Re: yes, I did chicken out
From:Perhaps the Wheel helped Monsarrat to change
Date: 2009-07-30 10:04 pm (UTC)FROM CRAIGSLIST (http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/mis/1292345262.html)
Your card: "Will anyone ever miss a connection with me?" - m4w (Somerville, MA)
Date: 2009-07-27, 7:58PM EDT
Reply To This Post
You left me an anonymous note on a card! It said you are a big fan of "missed connections" on Craigslist but had never gotten one.
Voila. You are my missed connection!! I hope you liked the art project.
Write me here or go to my website. You know the website because you know where you left the note! :)
* Location: Somerville, MA
* it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
Re: Perhaps the Wheel helped Monsarrat to change
Date: 2009-07-31 12:58 am (UTC)Re: Perhaps the Wheel helped Monsarrat to change
From:Re: Perhaps the Wheel helped Monsarrat to change
From:rebuttal
Date: 2009-07-31 12:03 pm (UTC)I argue that the information I presented - number of people who posted to the Wheel; quote from someone who thought the Wheel was “a good opinion”; quote from someone who thought it was good to “find out what’s on people’s minds,” wished the answers were funnier and liked that people had to physically write questions – is just as valid as your opinions.
People I did not quote posted to the Wheel saying how much they liked and appreciated it. Anonymous posters, like you, who had positive things to say.
I still agree that it was A MISTAKE not to include your opinions in my story. However, that does not mean that the story I wrote was completely fictional or fluffy.
If I follow-up on the story to show your view of the Wheel, I’ll need your help. Actually, I won’t need your help, since you’ve already given your opinions in response to my first inquiry. Thanks again! And sorry for ignoring you before.
Re: rebuttal
Date: 2009-07-31 01:07 pm (UTC)