[identity profile] brewso.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] davis_square
My husband put our valid permit sticker in the old-school location (back driver's side window) instead of the new requirements (front driver's side windshield). I didn't notice since we've been parking on the street with it that way for a month now with no problem. However, today we got a ticket - $50.00, no less! Will they even hear our case, or will they just argue that it's our fault for putting the sticker on wrong? I really don't want to waste my time if it's the latter, even though we technically have a valid permit.

Date: 2010-05-12 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] surrealestate.livejournal.com
I would fight it. Write a letter explaining what you just said -- that your husband screwed up, but the sticker has been on your car the whole time. Include the permit number. You might also consider calling, because you'll have to get yourself a new sticker, but they may give you trouble since you already have one for that car.

Good luck!

I keep wondering if/when they'll start ticketing for having multiple permits in the front windshield, which from what I understand is not allowed under the new rules. So many people do it, though.

Date: 2010-05-12 03:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] intuition-ist.livejournal.com
"if they can ticket, they will."

count on it.

Date: 2010-05-12 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mjperson.livejournal.com
If they want to ticket for that, the least they could do is not use stickers that can not be removed. I went to put this year's sticker on with several tools and a bottle of goo gone, with the full intention of making the new one the only sticker left.

I gave up after thirty minutes having gotten rid of about 1/3 of one of the three other stickers. I'm convinced the only way to get rid of those stickers is to smash the windshield and get it replaced.

Date: 2010-05-12 03:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] surrealestate.livejournal.com
I found them very difficult to remove with the wrong tools (of which I tried an assortment), but very easy (like, seconds) to remove once I did use the right tool: a razorblade scraper.

Date: 2010-05-12 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] clevernonsense.livejournal.com
ja! in a pinch a xacto blade will also work in just a bit longer.

Date: 2010-05-12 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] warlord-mit.livejournal.com
A razor scraper does a great job of removing old stickers. You can get it off in a minute. Then use some 409, fantastik, or goo gone to get rid of the excess adhesive.

Date: 2010-05-12 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] koloratur.livejournal.com
Nail polish remover works, too.

Date: 2010-05-12 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] srakkt.livejournal.com
I may be needlessly paranoid, here, but I would worry about acetone damaging the adhesive that holds the windshield in place.

Date: 2010-05-13 02:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
So long as you aren't hosing down the area with acetone, you should be fine.

I mean, wetting a rag or cotton ball with nail polish remover doesn't exactly get it into the windshield adhesive area.
Edited Date: 2010-05-13 02:59 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-05-12 04:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pekmez.livejournal.com
I have managed to time it so that my car inspection expires around when I've just gotten my new sticker in the mail, and I ask the inspection guys nicely if they can scrape the old sticker off while they've already got the scraper out and are standing next to my window. (The scraper is just a razor blade on a long stick, but they have one handy, and I don't.) I imagine you could ask at a gas station even if you're not already getting your car inspected, too.

Date: 2010-05-12 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] masswich.livejournal.com
I think this is a case worth appealing - very nicely. If they make you pay this one they truly are just in it for the money.

Date: 2010-05-12 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneagain.livejournal.com
Do they pretend to not be in it just for the money? When they were changing the regs, they said they could not afford to let people park here anymore without increasing what you pay at parking meters (and the truly ridiculous number of tickets they give out, sometimes, apparently, before the meter has even run out). I am not sure they would deny it.

Date: 2010-05-13 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
(and the truly ridiculous number of tickets they give out, sometimes, apparently, before the meter has even run out)

Is there any evidence they have done this where it wasn't a case of meter feeding?

Date: 2010-05-13 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneagain.livejournal.com
What constitutes evidence? Taking someone's word or not? I have spoken to at least 1 person who complained to the meter maid walking away that she still had 2 minutes on the meter, and the meter maid told her to appeal it. Not like the time/focus/aggravation someone has to go through to appeal it matters to the assholes giving the tickets. I have heard of it happening at least 1 or 2 times more than that, but I don't know the people well enough to know if they were making it up/ I don't know why they would lie to *me* about it, but I guess that's possible. For that matter, how exactly would one *provide* proof of that? Isn't your word against the meter maid's? When do they ever believe you, particularly when it does not behoove them to do so? I am asking these questions sincerely, frustration aside (as much as I can put it aside).

Date: 2010-05-13 02:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
If you've got a photograph of the meter with time on it, that's partial proof.

But you raise a good point - with all the technology we have, you'd think the meters should be designed to create a record of time expiration, which would prevent the "he said, she said" sort of thing.

If a meter maid gave me a ticket when I have time on the meter, and I haven't been feeding the meter - i consider it robbery, and I'll report it as such.

Date: 2010-05-13 02:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneagain.livejournal.com
"If you've got a photograph of the meter with time on it, that's partial proof."

Is there some reason that I could not have taken a photograph of someone else's meter?

"If a meter maid gave me a ticket when I have time on the meter, and I haven't been feeding the meter - i consider it robbery, and I'll report it as such."

I have to wonder if you have more free time/focus than I do. Adding something else to have to focus on is robbery as well.

Date: 2010-05-13 02:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
Is there some reason that I could not have taken a photograph of someone else's meter?

Take a picture of the meter in such a way as to show your vehicle (although I think the meters are all numbered, and wouldn't it be nice if the meter monkeys were required to write down the meter number on the ticket?)

Like I said, it's partial proof.

As far as the robbery thing - what would you do if you were at dunkin donuts, with your wallet open, and I took $25 out of it and just walked away?

Date: 2010-05-13 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneagain.livejournal.com
As far as the robbery thing - what would you do if you were at dunkin donuts, with your wallet open, and I took $25 out of it and just walked away?

Though I hear what you are saying, there is a rather large difference between some stranger approaching you and robbing you (in which case I'd turn around and kick them in the balls as hard as I could and then call the cops if possible), and a city organization sanctioning the same with impunity to the meter maid, leaving little to no recourse.

Date: 2010-05-13 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
Hey, it's your call what you'll put up with.

I think we've just hit on an issue that the city needs to look into if/when they change the meters, again: meter records that can be audited.

Date: 2010-05-13 03:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneagain.livejournal.com
I don't think it's my call if I will put up with it, with the parking office that believe the meter maids, hence no recourse. If it were my call, I absolutely would not put up with it.

And yes, this does put the parking office in the category of "worse than street criminals" to some degree.

I think we've just hit on an issue that the city needs to look into if/when they change the meters, again: meter records that can be audited.

Agreed.

Date: 2010-05-13 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
If it were my call, I absolutely would not put up with it

If it happened to me, and I had proof, I'd call the cops, just like I would if I were robbed.

Date: 2010-05-13 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneagain.livejournal.com
Huh. Never actually thought of that. Do you seriously think the cops would do anything about a parking ticket? Would never occur to me, but if you have information I don't on this matter, please do tell.

Date: 2010-05-13 03:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
I don't think they'll do anything, but getting things on the record about city officials lying and stealing from you (if they are) has got to be important, right?

Date: 2010-05-13 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneagain.livejournal.com
Huh. That never occurred to me. I'll have to give it some thought. Gotta hand it to you, you are bringing up ideas that would not have otherwise occurred to me. Thanks for that.

Date: 2010-05-13 03:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
Well, like I said, I don't think the PD will do anything, and it's likely they might try to fine you for a "false call" or whatever Somerville has like that on the books.

But, we do have incidents where the PCO's were clearly in the wrong, but T&P continues to say their PCO's NEVER are wrong.

Which is why I've asked about getting intersections marked at the 20 foot line, but the city says it's not worthwhile - which suggests two things to me: they don't care all that much about preventing people from parking in those spots; and they don't want to lose the revenue from ticketing people for it.

Date: 2010-05-13 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneagain.livejournal.com
Which is why I've asked about getting intersections marked at the 20 foot line, but the city says it's not worthwhile - which suggests two things to me: they don't care all that much about preventing people from parking in those spots; and they don't want to lose the revenue from ticketing people for it.

Do you know JB? Of GLSE? He asked the same question and has actually mentioned a desire to go around Somerville marking the sidewalks with pain so folks would know where it was ok to park (I don't believe he has gotten around to it, though, busy person that he is). I love the idea and actually saw something in passing the other day that looked like someone had tried to do that somewhere. I don't remember where, but I think it was in Somerville; wish I wasn't in such a hurry to get to where I was going or else I would have walked over to check it out.

My sweetie has mentioned the idea of creating a stealth street sign brigade to go and put up street signs where they are missing. He is another person overwhelmed by the busy, but I like the idea, and marking sidewalks could be added to the intention, so far as I am concerned:)

Date: 2010-05-13 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magid.livejournal.com
Yesterday I noticed a metered spot within 20 feet of an intersection. Which makes me wonder whether the city is just angling to have people in the wrong one way or another.

Date: 2010-05-13 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
Which makes me wonder whether the city is just angling to have people in the wrong one way or another.

Why wonder? With shite like that, it's obvious they are.

For our safetys', and wallets', sake, where was this meter?

Date: 2010-05-13 11:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magid.livejournal.com
If I'm remembering correctly, on Highland Ave, on the right as heading toward Davis, by the intersection with Waldo, I think. (Sorry for lack of specificity; I remember noting it more than the actual location, unfortunately.)

Date: 2010-05-13 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneagain.livejournal.com
For that matter, come to think of it, my sweetie has gotten a ticket at a time when he knew there was money in the meter. I was with him when it happened and saw him put money in. Is my word enough?

Date: 2010-05-13 02:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
I honestly don't know - but I know that all the evidence I have seen is that the city will only believe the word of their PCO's.

So, it's an uphill battle either way.

Witness people getting ticketed BEFORE the four hours between announcing a snow emergency and the tow time had elapsed.

Write to your aldercritter ... it did me a ton of good to so so with Pero (not).

Date: 2010-05-12 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skate97.livejournal.com
Also just as a note of annoyance, my husband tried to fight a ticket recently ($35, our headlight had just gone out and we got a ticket for "faulty equipment") and we were informed that there is a $25 processing fee to fight tickets now. I'm assuming it's to deter people from fighting them. Although we didn't want it on the driving record, it wasn't worth it to us to pay the $25 to potentially still have to pay the $35 if we lost, so I guess their plan worked, but still, annoying. I'm not sure if parking tickets have the same rule though.

Date: 2010-05-12 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veek.livejournal.com
Did you get this ticket from Somerville police, or from state police?

Date: 2010-05-12 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skate97.livejournal.com
State, so it could totally not apply.

Date: 2010-05-12 04:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tober.livejournal.com
Tickets for all "moving violations" (this includes pretty much every kind of motor vehicle infraction including things like faulty equipment but it does NOT include parking tickets) are adjudicated by the state court system and the $25 processing fee is with respect to those tickets and is applicable if you appeal such a ticket no matter who (local police, state police, MA transit police, etc) gave you the ticket. Parking tickets are different, they are adjudicated by whatever locality gave the ticket (i.e.- the city/town in which the allegedly illegal parking took place) and although a city/town probably can legally charge an appeal fee, whether any particular one does is a matter of the parking regulations of that city/town.

Date: 2010-05-13 10:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boblothrope.livejournal.com
Arlington charges $5 to appeal parking tickets.

IMO that's illegal, since parking ticket procedures are clearly defined in state law, and there's nothing authorizing an appeal fee.

Date: 2010-05-12 05:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
it wasn't worth it to us to pay the $25 to potentially still have to pay the $35 if we lost

You may not be saying that if your insurance rates go up.

Date: 2010-05-12 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skate97.livejournal.com
No, we know that, but even taking that into consideration, we couldn't spare the time off or cost of babysitter.

Date: 2010-05-14 04:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalimba21.livejournal.com
2 points on your insurance = $1200 over 6 years.

I recently appealed one to the magistrate, they waved my ticket without me even saying a word. I've been told that's generally how it goes over there if you show up.

The $25 fee started last July. I think it's unethical. And, if you don't get the decision you want from the magistrate, $50 to appeal it to a judge.

Date: 2010-05-12 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pearlythebunny.livejournal.com
For what it’s worth, so this doesn’t happen again, you may be able to move the sticker from the back window to the front. Several months ago, my front windshield got a crack in it, and the people at an auto glass shop transferred my inspection and resident-parking stickers from the old windshield to the new one. They told me that both Somerville and Cambridge had recently switched to a different adhesive, which makes it possible to transfer the stickers. I don’t know how they did it, but you could probably call a windshield glass place for advice. Maybe you could even have them transfer the sticker for you.

Date: 2010-05-13 02:38 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-05-13 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ron_newman
Glad to hear this!

The meter maid probably doesn't even look elsewhere on the car than where the permit is supposed to be. If the meter maid is new enough she may not even know about the former location.
Edited Date: 2010-05-13 06:03 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-05-13 01:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] turil.livejournal.com
My husband pointed out that putting a sticker (or anything that blocks the driver's view) on the driver's side windshield is illegal according to state law. I can't guarantee that's true, but he's usually pretty good about looking up laws, and it might be worth checking into, even if it wasn't your actual reason for not putting it there.
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
*sigh*

Again with giving out advice that is not correct?

Section 9D. No person shall operate any motor vehicle upon any public way or upon any way to which the public shall have the right of access with any of the following affixed thereto:

(1) a sign, poster or sticker on the front windshield, the side windows immediately adjacent to the operator’s seat and the front passenger seat, the side windows immediately to the rear of the operator’s seat and the front passenger seat and the rear window in such a manner so as to obstruct, impede or distort the vision of the operator.

source: http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/90-9d.htm (twenty seconds of searching the net)

So long as the parking sticker does not obstruct, impede or distort the vision of the operator, it isn't illegal, according to how that law is written.
Edited Date: 2010-05-13 02:39 pm (UTC)

Budget is bust.

Date: 2010-05-13 03:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nvidia99999.livejournal.com
State and cities desperately need your money! Carry out your civic duty by getting a parking ticket. It helps the community.

Re: Budget is bust.

Date: 2010-05-16 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gruene.livejournal.com
Or they could just *gasp* raise taxes and get the needed revenue in a more equitable manner.

Date: 2010-05-13 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
Additionally, in terms of fixing your sticker, see:
http://faqs.somervillema.intelligovsoftware.com/backwindow.aspx

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 4th, 2025 04:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios