yet another parking ticket post
Jun. 15th, 2010 09:17 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I'm hoping for some pointers on fighting this one. I got a notice in the mail the other day claiming I hadn't paid a parking ticket from the beginning of May. Well, considering I never GOT one, I can see why I never paid it.
But I know that won't help me any. However, I know for a fact that the night and time and place where I supposedly earned this ticket, I had a visitor permit in my car window. Now it's not like I have a picture with a date stamp to prove this, of course, but I could get the exact address and permit # of the person who has the permit I used. Heck, I could have 6 people vouch for my whereabouts and that I was using it even. But how much of this do I need to successfully contest this ticket (which never appeared on my windshield to begin with)? Or will none of it matter, and I'm stuck with this thing regardless even if I go in to my contest the ticket hearing with all of that or some of that?
Anyone know what exactly I might need to have this thing nixed, or am I indeed screwed? Thanks in advance!
But I know that won't help me any. However, I know for a fact that the night and time and place where I supposedly earned this ticket, I had a visitor permit in my car window. Now it's not like I have a picture with a date stamp to prove this, of course, but I could get the exact address and permit # of the person who has the permit I used. Heck, I could have 6 people vouch for my whereabouts and that I was using it even. But how much of this do I need to successfully contest this ticket (which never appeared on my windshield to begin with)? Or will none of it matter, and I'm stuck with this thing regardless even if I go in to my contest the ticket hearing with all of that or some of that?
Anyone know what exactly I might need to have this thing nixed, or am I indeed screwed? Thanks in advance!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:29 pm (UTC)I showed up at the time listed on the letter to contest it, very calmly explaining the facts. I also brought the permit numbers with me, stating it would have been one of these two that would have been displayed.
I'm going to take a wild shot and guess you might have out of state tags. I did, and I feel I was probably targeted because of it.
They've been doing this for awhile - never physically issuing a ticket and just waiting until it escalates (with extra fines, of course, for having not paid it first time around) and forcing us to pay more money. Still irritates me to no end.
Good luck - just remember to stay polite when talking to them!
(As a side note, they agreed to dismiss this ticket but then I got a douchebaggy letter saying that while they were waiving the fees this time, they felt the ticket had been issued correctly. IF SO, THEN I SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED IT. D:< )
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:38 pm (UTC)Thanks for the info and advice--gives me hope that having the exact address & permit #s could help. Although still annoying I'll have to take time off of work to fight the damn thing.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 01:13 pm (UTC)Wow, when was the last time you were in East Somerville?
My gf doen't drive, and she has no problem getting around the area, and to work, without a car.
I know it's the hinterlands of the downtrodden low class who aren't privileged enough to all own bikes or have telecommuting jobs, but you really should try looking at all the bus routes in the area.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 03:16 pm (UTC)I've lived in places with the "downtrodden low class" that have been infinitely more pleasant to spend time in than East Somerville, because the primary mode of transit has been subway and walking rather than driving everywhere. More pleasant other than the apartment and laundromat robberies, that is.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:43 pm (UTC)Yeah, irritating. But it seems to be part of their form letter.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:49 pm (UTC)Their loss, although I am sad I only get Dave's Fresh maybe once every six weeks now...
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 04:59 pm (UTC)it's bs, and like it would kill them to have more than one form letter, but still. i might be bored enough to go look for the post :D you're not alone anyway.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 05:18 pm (UTC)Of course, I suppose it's just too much to ask for a city office to admit when they're wrong.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 05:49 pm (UTC)honestly, if they're going to be dicks, i'd rather my car at least be there when i get back to it.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-17 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-17 08:37 pm (UTC)and still, they tow for street cleaning and i've even had my car towed once for an expired registration parked in a permit spot.
obv not saying i was in the right for any of these, but cambridge is very tow-happy and if i had to choose, i'd take ticket happy over ticket AND tow happy!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 06:18 pm (UTC)I have no issues with individual city staff members, but I think it's also becoming evident that there are completely dishonest practices going on.
I also have no beef with the rules themselves - but when I can't be certain that I won't be ticketed when following their own rules, I think I have a very valid reason to be upset with their policies. This entire post is filled with peoples' experiences that all seem to point to dishonesty with the system.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 06:29 pm (UTC)What about those tickets that were issued erroneously, but the city lies to cover their ass - does that make the city a better place to live?
Seriously - we have ample evidence that the city does NOT care if their PCO's are doing the right thing or not, and doesn't really care about some of their stated objective for certain parking restriction except as a way to generate revenue.
How does that make the city better?
no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-16 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 09:45 pm (UTC)Ummm, I've lived here for almost two years and don't live in fear of getting ticketed. I've received only one and that was my own fault for not moving on a sweeping day. I live in more fear of the mongoloids who can't drive through the streets without hitting side view mirrors.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-17 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 05:01 pm (UTC)(that was easier and more recent than i expected, heh!)
so yeah, i was going to say to the OP, contest it, they'll probably throw it out, just try not to say anything but "thank you" when they inevitably give you some line about "but next time..."
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 04:42 pm (UTC)Anecdotes are not proof, of course, but just last week I got a pair of tickets dismissed - one for parking within twenty feet of an intersection, then one from a week later for parking within ten feet of a hydrant. I live in a corner, so parking in front of my house far enough from the hydrant puts me within twenty feet of the intersection. Ticket #1 meant I moved my car a few feet down, so the rear end of it was just barely past the "permit parking" sign. Which got me the hydrant ticket. The substance of my appeal was basically "come on, this sucks." Which worked.
It is probably worth getting the address and permit number; I think the clerks like having something specific to put in the files.
As for never getting it - well, it's only speculation, but I've often seen tickets in the gutters. I usually blame high winds for it.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 06:32 pm (UTC)If they'd simply mark these two sort of locations, they actually increase the safety they claim to be protecting.
That they refuse to mark them indicates what their real motivation is.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 06:41 pm (UTC)But, yes, it does seem revenue-related. And I, for one, would prefer to just see excise taxes on cars raised rather than have unpredictable ticket shakedowns. (I'd rather not have either, of course, but I'd take the excise tax as the lesser evil.)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 05:05 pm (UTC)