For people who are random-link averse: Someone was struck by a red line train at Kendal Station. "The T is using shuttle buses to move passengers between the Broadway station in South Boston and the Harvard Square station in Cambridge as of 11:30 a.m., according to the T's website (http://www.mbta.com/rider_tools/transit_updates/?ttype=subway&route=Red+Line#details)."
(edited to add a link to the quote above to the relevant webpage for updates about how they're handling the issue)
I was on the red line when this happened. The first announcement was that we were standing by because of a disabled train in South Station. After backing back into Harvard, they said we were standing by because of a medical emergency in Kendall. No further note was made of the original "problem."
My question is: did they lie, or did the Kendall emergency simply preempt the South Station problem?
I'm guessing they lied initially. That's their instinctive response. By later in the day, to their credit, the announcement was that there was "a medical emergency at Kendall... person struck by a train".
When they had the green line crash last year a remember the announcements saying "due to a medical emergency", which while technically true omitted certain key information.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-29 05:29 pm (UTC)(edited to add a link to the quote above to the relevant webpage for updates about how they're handling the issue)
no subject
Date: 2010-11-29 09:35 pm (UTC)My question is: did they lie, or did the Kendall emergency simply preempt the South Station problem?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-29 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-30 09:16 pm (UTC)