In the Huffington Post, Lindsay Garvey says that she lost her job "as a server at a popular new restaurant in Somerville, MA" because her iPhone alarm failed to go off as scheduled on New Year's Day.
I don't think I know her,nor do I know what restaurant she worked at, but maybe some of you do. Edit: it's Foundry on Elm, according to a new story on the Somerville Journal website
Edit: there's a real software bug in the iPhone alarms that didn't show up until 1/1/11; here's an article about it and here's another
I don't think I know her,
Edit: there's a real software bug in the iPhone alarms that didn't show up until 1/1/11; here's an article about it and here's another
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 03:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 03:50 pm (UTC)Somebody with "two Bachelors' of Arts and experience in a variety of professions" ought to ostensibly count as a grown adult, and if they can't get themselves out of bed at the appointed hour, how is that anybody's fault but their own?
The entitlement! It burns!
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 03:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 04:01 pm (UTC)I'm sure the young lady is a nice person and all, but a sense of personal responsibility goes a long way.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 04:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 04:12 pm (UTC)(b) She conveniently doesn't explain the so-called "glitch". Sorry hon, but letting your phone battery run out isn't a "glitch". Neither is setting your alarm to PM instead of AM. Neither of these is the fault of Steve Jobs or AT&T. And iPhones don't have a "known alarm glitch" that you feel Mr Jobs should have warned you about.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 04:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 04:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 06:23 pm (UTC)With BOTH, I haven't missed a wake up call.
And frankly, to wait until a failure or notification of a glitch to decide that you might have invested in a 5$ battery operated alarm clock (quoting Ms. Linds on that one) is just stupid and therefore, you are absolutely NOT absolved of the personal responsibility that you seem to think equipment failure should absolve you of.
Also, wonderful employees don't get sacked for one incident of tardiness. But that's been said already.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 07:26 pm (UTC)Also, she turns out to be the girlfriend of Anthony Bourdain's driver, so suddenly in the middle of a media storm
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 07:33 pm (UTC)And seriously? I have had way too many issues with cell phone alarms in the past (not hearing them, the battery running down, hitting snooze and accidentally shutting it off) to ever rely on one to get me up when I absolutely need to be awake. Glitch or no, blaming your firing on a cell phone alarm - even one as splendid as an iPhone - just makes you appear to be a whiny brat.
Although it does make the fact that you were fired less of a mystery, I suppose.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 07:46 pm (UTC)he's so cute.
however, he is REALLY LOUD. like, exponentially louder than i thought. i wish he had a volume control so i could use him as an alarm clock :(
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 11:58 pm (UTC)So?? That doesn't mean they SHOULD. It's stupid to rely on a phone alarm if you really have to be punctual. Should the business world change its expectations to accommodate kids' preferences of using their (unreliable) phones instead of actual clocks? I don't think so.
PS. I'm a millennial who only has a cell, no landline, and watches TV via the internet, no cable. I'm not a technophobe. But there's no way I'd use this idiotic excuse. Unless maybe I'd already used up all my excuses...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-06 04:39 am (UTC)I am on the "it's her fault" side. I set two alarms because I am concerned about keeping my job and being on time. She says: "Having two Bachelors' of Arts and experience in a variety of professions, you may think I am overqualified for a job as a server. You'd be right."
Maybe she considers herself overqualified, but she wouldn't be qualified for any job that I was hiring for with that attitude. She is the kind of person that gives people like me (I am looking for a second job and would actually take it seriously even if it were a job in retail that I'm "overqualified" for) a bad name.
I'm honestly repulsed by the entitlement she reeks of in that blog entry. "I can afford to pay $100/month for a phone because I'm working at a job that I am too good for, and now I lost the job because my $100/month phone didn't wake me up." Try being a single parent earning minimum wage who loses their job because they have to stay home with their sick kid.
Bottom line? If the job was actually important to her, she would have put in more of an effort to be there. She didn't and she lost the job. And now she's putting her future job potential in jeopardy by blogging about it in an easily-Googleable and sickeningly entitled way. Wherever she applies in the future, they could easily find the article and realize that she doesn't take being at work on time seriously, she doesn't take the privacy of the business seriously, and she won't take a job seriously if she feels it's beneath her. I hope every service job she applies to in the future Googles her. It's just... appalling to me.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-06 04:45 am (UTC)I think the publicity will help her get another job -- at least, I hope so. She didn't put the privacy of her employer's business in jeopardy -- we did that here ;-)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-06 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-06 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-10 07:15 pm (UTC)as for this girl, if they did have such a policy she would have known about it, and then i'd think set more than one alarm but then again, with her attitude toward the whole thing, maybe not :p