![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Unofficial Somerville election results, broken down by precinct and ward, are here. I don't think you'll find any great surprises. Citywide:
Total votes: 35062
Obama-Biden: 28467 (81.2%)
Romney-Ryan: 4865 (13.9%)
Stein-Honkala: 747 (2.1%)
Johnson-Gray: 543 (1.5%)
Write In: 108 (0.3%)
Blank: 332 (0.9%)
Local question 4, the Community Preservation Act property tax surcharge, won overwhelmingly, 24358-7714 (with 2990 blanks). I hope this will bring much-needed repairs and restoration to the West Branch Library and the Prospect Hill Tower.
I'd love to compare this year's local results to 2008, but I can't find them online anywhere. If you know where to find these, please link to them in the comments here. The pages linked from my 11/7/2008 post no longer work. ETA: Tom Champion e-mailed me an Excel spreadsheet from which I extracted these citywide results for 2008. I also converted that 2008 spreadsheet into a Google Doc which you can find here.
This post is an open thread for any discussion whatsoever about yesterday's election (Somerville-related or otherwise).
Total votes: 35062
Obama-Biden: 28467 (81.2%)
Romney-Ryan: 4865 (13.9%)
Stein-Honkala: 747 (2.1%)
Johnson-Gray: 543 (1.5%)
Write In: 108 (0.3%)
Blank: 332 (0.9%)
Local question 4, the Community Preservation Act property tax surcharge, won overwhelmingly, 24358-7714 (with 2990 blanks). I hope this will bring much-needed repairs and restoration to the West Branch Library and the Prospect Hill Tower.
I'd love to compare this year's local results to 2008, but I can't find them online anywhere. If you know where to find these, please link to them in the comments here. The pages linked from my 11/7/2008 post no longer work. ETA: Tom Champion e-mailed me an Excel spreadsheet from which I extracted these citywide results for 2008. I also converted that 2008 spreadsheet into a Google Doc which you can find here.
This post is an open thread for any discussion whatsoever about yesterday's election (Somerville-related or otherwise).
no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 03:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 11:19 pm (UTC)Total votes: 32815
Obama-Biden: 26450 (80.6%)
McCain-Palin: 5197 (15.8%)
Nader-Gonzalez: 295 (0.8%)
Barr-Root: 200 (0.6%)
McKinney-Clemente: 153 (0.5%)
Baldwin-Castle: 52 (0.2%)
Write In: 160 (0.5%)
Blank: 308 (0.9%)
We had 2247 more voters in Somerville this year.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 12:32 am (UTC)Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 01:25 am (UTC)Cool
Date: 2012-11-08 03:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 03:43 am (UTC)i figured everyone moved inside because it was (theoretically) warmer than standing outside. i admit i was really surprised when i got there at ten and there was NO ONE waiting outside, and then i was surprised again when there was this long line snaking up and down the hall inside and up the stairs.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-10 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-10 01:08 am (UTC)"Sheriff Koutoujian increased the savings from the inmate Community Work Program by 50% over the previous year. This inmate labor program completed municipal projects across the county for free, bringning $1.5million in savings to the taxpayers."
So you are saying the above inmake labor program most likely involved volunteers? Or inmates were paid internally but the labor was still free to those who benefited? I confess confusion and am open to illumination here.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-10 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-10 03:10 pm (UTC)No, not in the way I mean it--I mean something closer to daily contact with the prisoners, or even weekly, seeing them, knowing how they are doing and what's going on with them, perhaps a closer vantage point to see their circumstances, and how they could be rehabilitaed.
"Having had bad personal experiences with corrections officers (Petrone's only 'qualification' so far as I could tell) I wasn't about to vote for one."
May I ask about that exeperience? No pressure, but I am curious. I have only second-hand experience with corrections officers in Ma as the father of someone dear to me worked as one, and I know a bit about the friendships that transpired when the prisoners were released. I would not doubt that there were some bad ones, but I'm curious more specifically what happened if you feel comfortable sharing.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-07 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-08 09:36 pm (UTC)I believe any campaign is allowed to station poll watchers and take down names this way, to support their get-out-the-vote efforts.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-09 02:39 pm (UTC)As Ron mentioned, the campaigns are legally entitled to send observers to the polls. They are supposed to sit behind the inspectors and not interact with the voters in anyway. However, the inspectors are then required to clearly repeat the voter's name and address so the observers can record it.
The reason campaigns send observers is so they can make sure the supporters they identified through canvassing actually vote. If you told a Warren volunteer you were supporting her and didn't vote before 4pm, they would then make an effort to contact you and get you to the polls. That's how such efforts typically work anyway.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-10 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-10 12:13 am (UTC)