I think calling it corrupt is pushing it. It's more like city employees who develop a small sense of self and their only joy is inflicting their tiny little bureaucratic power upon others.
I call it corrupt - if it was not legal for the ticket to be issued (in the case of the snow parking one years ago), but they say they did nothing wrong, in order to prevent it from being used as precedent, they are trying to preserve their ability to ticket people unlawfully. Thus, it's corrupt.
Actually, I think it's so they never set any precedent of having certain types of tickets overturned. That way, no one can ever say ,"But you said you were wrong about my friend's ticket." Each case is considered individual.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-02 04:07 pm (UTC)This is their standard response, even when it is clear the city was wrong.
They did this to someone who was ticketed before the ticket window opened in a snow emergency a few years back.
It's obviously corrupt, but how does one fight it?
no subject
Date: 2013-04-02 07:59 pm (UTC)OK, corrupt works.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-02 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-03 01:11 am (UTC)