![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I got this e-mail from Ward 6 Alderman Rebekah Gewirtz:
I wanted to update you that I have now had two meetings with the proponents of a place called "World of Beer" that wants to go into the Social Security Bldg space [240 Elm Street]. The lawyer for the new owner of the space, Mike Amato, is Rich DiGirolomo. I have told them that I am VERY concerned about this as a possible use since I don't want to see a drinking hole in Davis that allows you to bring in your own food and barely serves any food of their own. They have told me I have the wrong idea and it will be craft brews geared towards an "upscale" crowd. I am highly skeptical.
In response to my concerns, the proponents have now said they are going to partner with a restaurant to come into the space to share adjoining spaces. I'm not sure how that would work. They would like to have a community meeting ON SITE on Wed April 17th at 6:30pm. Can you please help me spread the word far and wide so we can get a large turnout of people who will ask key questions about what they are trying to do?
I wanted to update you that I have now had two meetings with the proponents of a place called "World of Beer" that wants to go into the Social Security Bldg space [240 Elm Street]. The lawyer for the new owner of the space, Mike Amato, is Rich DiGirolomo. I have told them that I am VERY concerned about this as a possible use since I don't want to see a drinking hole in Davis that allows you to bring in your own food and barely serves any food of their own. They have told me I have the wrong idea and it will be craft brews geared towards an "upscale" crowd. I am highly skeptical.
In response to my concerns, the proponents have now said they are going to partner with a restaurant to come into the space to share adjoining spaces. I'm not sure how that would work. They would like to have a community meeting ON SITE on Wed April 17th at 6:30pm. Can you please help me spread the word far and wide so we can get a large turnout of people who will ask key questions about what they are trying to do?
no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 03:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 09:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 04:05 pm (UTC)Looks like it's a live music venue, too. I wonder whether that's the real objection. My only qualm is that it's a franchise, so it's not clear how much of the take would stay in Somerville.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 04:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 07:03 pm (UTC)Most bars make the majority of their money through liquor sales. It is pretty ridiculous when cities try to force a bar to have a certain percentage of their revenue come from food sales. Cambridge did the same thing to Lord Hobo. A nice space with a large selection of different beers would fit in just fine in Davis Square. If the bar and its' clientele prove to be a nuisance there are mechanisms already in place to deal with that.
Rebekah Gerwirtz seems to be suffering from a strong case of NIMBYism.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 07:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 10:29 pm (UTC)Personally, between this, the froyo thing, and the parking lot/hotel, I'm concerned about the anti free-market stance of city government and whether it is really acting in our best interest. There is very little business in Somerville to begin with, and we should be welcoming people who want to invest, not harassing them.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 12:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 12:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 01:42 pm (UTC)Partly because governments are trailing-edge adopters, whereas the aldermen have an incentive to be reachable however their constituents demand. And I suppose if you're paranoid, you don't have to worry about the city management spying on your e-mail if you're using Gmail.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 05:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 06:00 am (UTC)It reminds me a lot of the mayor's blocking use of the star market space on broadway. They wanted to turn it into a dollar store and were midway through signing a lease when the city stepped in and said "not in my town.". Froyo place another example. City says no, then lets the property sit vacant for months. It's not fair to midsize retailers and it doesn't do anything to actually encourage of make it possible for small businesses that everyone says they want to be able to afford space in these areas. City says they want more diversified use, but doesn't quite acknowledge the economic realities that prevent such use from taking hold. The aldermen may not singlehandedly be able to lower rents, but they could certainly help steer initiatives that encouraged small business development and built in incentives for landlords to keep these leases affordable.
I would be excited about a proposal that helped world of beer find suitable space (or alternatively, seemed like it was addressing the reasons why more "desirable" business hasn't already moved into the Davis square space - namely pricing and affordability). Ths post seems to indicate a lack of awareness of the realities of running a small to midsize business in Somerville, namely, that there are very few commercial spaces available at any given time that meet the magical location + code + affordability formula - and just saying no without addressing that is tantamount to saying "actually, we just don't want your business in Somerville, why don't you try just outside the city lines?". Which would be too bad, given that if a craft brew store went in here it would surely be patronized.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 07:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 01:52 pm (UTC)My sense is that rules like this tend to contribute to high food prices--if you get two beers and a $10 burger there's a good chance that you're going to actually hurt the ratio under that rule. I wonder if you could accomplish something similar by simply requiring all patrons to be seated when served, or some other approach...?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 01:44 pm (UTC)Seems hard to imagine anything truly "upscale" surviving in Somerville. It's got one of the lowest per capita incomes of the Boston burbs, though I suppose it's moved up since I last saw the figures. People are gonna go there to drink...
no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 01:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 04:38 pm (UTC)I don't think Davis is in any danger of turning into Allston/Brighton any time soon.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 04:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-11 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-12 10:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-04-17 04:11 pm (UTC)