![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
According to a Facebook post from Alderman-at-Large Jack Connolly, Roche Bros. proposes to open a grocery store in the former Social Security Building, 240 Elm Street. They will hold an on-site meeting to discuss this on Wednesday, September 10 at 6 pm.
Roche Bros. is a local family-owned supermarket chain whose current locations are mostly in the beyond-128 suburbs. They are now building their first urban store in the former Filene's Basement space in Downtown Crossing.
I really hope this happens. I think it suits Davis Square's needs better than the previous World of Beer and Beer Works proposals.
ETA: Based on the illustration that Jack provided, what they actually seem to be proposing is a new sub-brand of smaller Roche stores called "Brothers Marketplace", whose first location opened in Weston a few months ago. Their Facebook page is more informative than their rather skeletal website.
Roche Bros. is a local family-owned supermarket chain whose current locations are mostly in the beyond-128 suburbs. They are now building their first urban store in the former Filene's Basement space in Downtown Crossing.
I really hope this happens. I think it suits Davis Square's needs better than the previous World of Beer and Beer Works proposals.
ETA: Based on the illustration that Jack provided, what they actually seem to be proposing is a new sub-brand of smaller Roche stores called "Brothers Marketplace", whose first location opened in Weston a few months ago. Their Facebook page is more informative than their rather skeletal website.
no subject
Date: 2014-08-18 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-18 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-18 10:01 pm (UTC)JP has a bigger problem in that regard than we do, I think, but IANAUP (I am not an urban planner)
no subject
Date: 2014-08-18 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-18 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-19 02:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-18 08:54 pm (UTC)I expect they're assuming that many customers would have their own carts and/or use buses to carry things home, and wouldn't need much parking. I'm not sure how likely that would be--it'd be true for me, but I'm not buying an entire family's worth of groceries each week.
no subject
Date: 2014-08-18 09:32 pm (UTC)I like Roche Brothers stores alot and it would be nice to have one in town that is more easily accessible to those without a car.
That being said where is the typical Davis Sq Livejournal outrage on this proposal? A chain grocery store opening up basically across the street from McKinnon's, an independent local business with a very similar product mix. All I hear is crickets……
no subject
Date: 2014-08-18 09:52 pm (UTC)Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-18 10:04 pm (UTC)Their absence has really left a gap in terms of how much of one's actual grocery shopping one can get done on foot in the square.
Completely unrelatedly: anybody else remember their Sunday Morning Special? That was fantastic.
Agreed!
Date: 2014-08-18 10:51 pm (UTC)RE: Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-19 12:15 am (UTC)RE: Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-19 12:47 am (UTC)RE: Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-19 03:09 am (UTC)My comment about crickets was more directed at the many people in this community that where adamant and vocal in their opposition to the previous beer related proposals for this same location. Myself and some other posters were essentially called delusional when we suggested that much of the concerns raised about the the prior proposals were being exaggerated and were being applied very selectively, with the intent to ultimately drive away a totally viable new business looking to come to our city. It was very obvious then as it is now, that many people who said they are opposed to chains coming to the square can quite easily champion a chain business as long as it is place they would personally like to have in that location. Concerns about the health of existing local business who might face increased competition can easily be explained away. Liquor licenses that were supposedly only available for under-served areas of the city, because Davis is doing just fine already and it has too many establishment serving liquor as it is can suddenly have the restrictions on them removed. I could go on and on here. All of this just reinforces what I have been saying all along, a small group of residents stirred up by Alderman Gewirtz, used many dubious arguments to essentially drive away two prospective tenants from a long vacant building. They used these PC arguments, to hide their true motive which was from the beginning to drive a business they personally did like away. They succeeded and many here applauded them, I on the other hand was disgusted.
Dirty politics is just as distasteful when "your side" wins. I want no part of that in my community. Lets all hope that this time all parties involved can behave in a more rational manner.
RE: Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-19 03:15 am (UTC)Re: Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-19 03:22 am (UTC)I have no problem with chains. But yet another pub....not so much.
RE: Re: Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-19 01:57 pm (UTC)RE: Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-19 03:21 am (UTC)To that end, I think Yet Another Bar is just as bad as Yet Another Froyo Place or Yet Another Burrito Place - all of the arguments we've heard over and over again for the last fifteen years.
So while, yes, Beer Works would have done well, so will nearly anything that goes into that space. Nothing has, not because of community opposition, but because the landlord refuses to actually repair or maintain that property.
I can't speak to the involvement of any aldermen, and I wouldn't even claim that there are sides to the issue. We all want to live somewhere great. Getting people in a community involved in these decisions isn't dirty politics. It's the way politics is *supposed* to happen.
RE: Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-19 12:05 pm (UTC)I disagree with the way Alderman Gewirtz personally handled the situation, but if it has a positive outcome, at least we avoided the worst case scenario.
RE: Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-19 09:47 pm (UTC)As far as my comment on dirty politics, need I remind you of the VFW Hall/condo development circus that was discussed in great detail here several years ago. It was very informative and it really opened my eyes. Whether you were for or against that proposal, you must agree that Alderman Gewirtzs' little end run around the process to get the MBTA vent parcel rezoned was clearly not what someone negotiating in good faith would do. After months of litigation and numerous compromises by the developer the project was explicitly approved by the city. She could not deal with that apparently and used her influence to kill it be any means necessary after her other attempts ultimately failed. This greatly shapes my opinion that alderman Gewirtz was never negotiating in good faith on residents behalf to make an acceptable compromise on the World of Beer/BeerWorks proposals. She wanted those projects stopped and she succeeded by abusing the valid political process for community involvement. That is what I find distasteful and what I mean by dirty politics.
RE: Rather than competition, complementary.
Date: 2014-08-19 10:20 pm (UTC)My experience with these community meetings is that the moderators seem unable to make them very productive; they tend to get mired in minutae. One person after another will bring up issues that the folks proposing a business had already answered: "Yes, but will there be TV's showing sports?"
I feel like people who are in the business of having products delivered to their store on a daily basis probably have a pretty good handle on the feasibility of food delivery, so I hope they can simply give a decisive answer rather than issues like that taking up most of the time.
no subject
Date: 2014-08-18 09:53 pm (UTC)On site?
Date: 2014-08-18 10:53 pm (UTC)Re: On site?
Date: 2014-08-18 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-19 12:01 am (UTC)Fantastic news!
Date: 2014-08-19 04:32 am (UTC)Re: Fantastic news!
Date: 2014-08-19 11:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-19 02:16 pm (UTC)Delivery Truck Routes
Date: 2014-08-19 02:46 pm (UTC)Re: Delivery Truck Routes
Date: 2014-08-19 02:59 pm (UTC)RE: Re: Delivery Truck Routes
Date: 2014-08-19 03:13 pm (UTC)Delivery truck traffic on Holland Street has become almost unbearable the last few years. The street is full of potholes and the trucks seem to get bigger and deliver at all times of the day. Cambridge has shut down all feeder street access from Mass Ave including Beech St, so even trucks that delivery at the Porter Star Market arrive via Holland.
Somerville needs to set up some kind of delivery truck task force to work with the business community and set limits on the size of trucks along with delivery routes and times.
RE: Delivery Truck Routes
Date: 2014-08-22 11:37 am (UTC)Re: Delivery Truck Routes
Date: 2014-08-22 12:54 pm (UTC)RE: Re: Delivery Truck Routes
Date: 2014-08-22 01:11 pm (UTC)Re: Re: Delivery Truck Routes
Date: 2014-08-22 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-19 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-19 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-19 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-19 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-19 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-20 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-20 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-20 01:30 pm (UTC)It's as expensive as you assume, though.
When it comes to grocery stores, I just wish Market Basket would get back on track...
no subject
Date: 2014-08-23 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-19 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-08-30 04:42 pm (UTC)