[identity profile] mindstalk.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] davis_square
Article that I thought might be relevant, given the Everett thing. Seems likely that there's only so much gambling money to go around, and it's being divided up more and more. Hope the state doesn't end up having to bail out the new projects, which would seem to defeat the whole point.

http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/americas-casino-saturation-problem

Date: 2014-11-21 07:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] somervilleguy.livejournal.com
If this doesn't work out it will just be converted to elderly housing with a really nice gaming room.

Date: 2014-11-21 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] achinhibitor.livejournal.com
Fortunately, the state has no commitment to bail them out. Of course, there will be political pressure to "save the jobs" (especially if they're unionized). But the bail-out will most likely be to reduce the compensation they have to pay to the state. The ugly case will be if they're slated to pay off infrastructure improvements but then don't have the income to do so. The state will be out that money.

Date: 2014-11-21 10:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keithn.livejournal.com
I seriously doubt Everett will ever have a problem since it's right in the middle of a metro area containing 4.7 million people, and by law, it will always be the closest casino for Boston area residents in the state. Atlantic City is (was?) a destination city and doesn't have a population of its own to sustain all of the casinos it has, so when casinos were built all over the northeast people had a closer option than Atlantic City. That will never happen with the Everett casino since it's already in the back yard of almost 5 million people. It's apples and oranges.
Edited Date: 2014-11-21 10:30 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-11-22 07:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hammercock.livejournal.com
I read something the other day about some kind of proposal (I forget by whom, alas) to charge MA residents some kind of big fee to enter the casino as a way to discourage problem gambling in locals, while allowing non-residents free entry. Apparently Singapore does this. I don't know how likely it is to happen here, but I can say it would certainly discourage me from visiting, both from an economic standpoint and a "fuck that" standpoint.

Date: 2014-11-24 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gruene.livejournal.com
Monaco does the same thing. You're not allowed to enter Monte Carlo with a Monegasque passport.
Edited Date: 2014-11-24 05:10 pm (UTC)

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 07:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios