[identity profile] rozhinka.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] davis_square
Operation Blessing is controlled by Pat Robertson, one of the most dangerous people on this earth.

Date: 2005-09-02 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tisana.livejournal.com
Thanks for letting us know.
The Red Cross is usually a safe bet.

Date: 2005-09-02 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talonvaki.livejournal.com
Or Goodwill.

Date: 2005-09-02 05:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] srl.livejournal.com
Oxfam is also really good for relief efforts-- immediate, but they also do more than the red cross to address the structural issues that contribute to disasters like this--- poverty being the main one in this case, because poor people without cars got stuck in the city where people with money got out.

Date: 2005-09-03 07:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowmentality.livejournal.com
The Red Cross is not being allowed into New Orleans. (http://www.redcross.org/faq/0,1096,0_682_4524,00.html#4524)

Date: 2005-09-02 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] visage.livejournal.com
A quote from elsewhere, yesterday:

"A good friend who is an atheist bleeding-heart liberal with several masters in social work, sociology, psychology and a Ph.D in one of those disciplines and who cannot stand even the mention of Pat Robertson, nevertheless has glowing praise for the work of Operation Blessing. She believes them to be effectively organized and committed to being there for people."


Do you happen to have objections to Operation Blessing's actual behavior? I confess to absolute ignorance on that subject.

Date: 2005-09-02 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] komos.livejournal.com
Political stumping has been deemed by management to be appropriate in the community.

Date: 2005-09-02 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] easy-wind.livejournal.com
you have a real chip on your shoulder. have you considered leaving the community?

Date: 2005-09-02 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] komos.livejournal.com
It is simply a statement that reflects the current attitudes governing statements of this sort.

And no, but thanks for your concern.

Date: 2005-09-02 05:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] visage.livejournal.com
I'm sorry, what are you trying to express with this comment? I have to admit ignorance to *that*, as well.

Date: 2005-09-02 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] komos.livejournal.com
Entirely fair. It was largely just to mark the occurence, and wasn't entirely appropriate as a response to your query. Apologies.

I am wondering when someone will post the Phoenix's list of companies that support right-wing causes, though.

Date: 2005-09-02 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] visage.livejournal.com
Ah, it was more a response to the original post than to my reply? Ok, much more clear now. :)

Date: 2005-09-02 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] komos.livejournal.com
Essentially, yes. ^_^

More appropriate to your comment: I have difficulty with value judgements placed upon an organization solely because of individuals associated with it. For instance, I know that the founders of LL Bean have strong ties to the pro-life lobby, but that doesn't mean that they don't provide a good product, and it doesn't mean that the community service the company performs should be dismissed out of hand. It seems akin to the single-issue voting idea.

I'm not a fan of the man, either, but unless the organization is providing bad service or makes preaching part of their aid package, it seems a little unfair to blacklist them without reviewing their record.

Date: 2005-09-02 04:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] st-darwin.livejournal.com
It seems to be a mixed bag (http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_08_28.php#006385) - high marks from some organizations, but a history of co-mingling donations with Pat's for-profit companies that cozy up to dictators.

There are a lot of reputable charities to give money to and lessen the risk of misuse - I like America's Second Harvest (http://www.secondharvest.org/default2.asp), but there are others listed at Billmon (http://billmon.org/archives/002122.html) and elsewhere. It is distressing that Operation Blessing was (for a while) pulled out of alphabetical order to be the #2 on FEMA's list, but far worse things have happened in the past few days.

architecture for humanity.

Date: 2005-09-02 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] irelandchik.livejournal.com
for those architecture folk, architectureforhumanity.org is also a good place to check out/donate.

Date: 2005-09-02 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rxrfrx.livejournal.com
http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemID=13994

couldn't find the primary sources, though.

Date: 2005-09-02 06:43 pm (UTC)
ext_9394: (Default)
From: [identity profile] antimony.livejournal.com
The following post has a long list of secular, non-secular but generally help-oriented, and unabashedly secular charities here:

http://www.livejournal.com/community/dark_christian/245640.html

Do with the information as you wish.

Date: 2005-09-03 03:36 am (UTC)
ext_9394: (Default)
From: [identity profile] antimony.livejournal.com
Edit, that last should be "unabashedly" religious, not secular.

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78 910
11121314151617
181920212223 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 10:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios