Page Summary
ocschwar.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tendertalons.livejournal.com - (no subject)
push-stars.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lesliet-ma.livejournal.com - Almost certainly Bradford pears
ah42.livejournal.com - (no subject)
two-stabs.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ron_newman - (no subject)
kalimba21.livejournal.com - flowering pears
Style Credit
- Base style: Lefty by
- Theme: City Spring by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 07:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 12:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 02:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 03:13 am (UTC)The flowers on the tree in question are, in contrast, much smaller than dogwood flowers, don't have bite marks, have five petals per flower, and the flowers grow together in corymb inflorescences (bunches :) of about 20, plus or minus a lot.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 03:12 pm (UTC)Almost certainly Bradford pears
Date: 2006-04-16 03:36 pm (UTC)Link to more info
Date: 2006-04-16 03:40 pm (UTC)Re: Link to more info
Date: 2006-04-16 11:34 pm (UTC)I would not have thought them pear trees, since I've never seen them make pears.
Fruits are small and inconspicuous
Date: 2006-04-16 11:49 pm (UTC)Re: Fruits are small and inconspicuous
Date: 2006-04-17 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-16 09:57 pm (UTC)i agree with
Pears vs cherries
Date: 2006-04-16 11:59 pm (UTC)Here are a few distinguishing features.
First, take a look at the over-all shape. (Look at the picture of the Bradford pear on the first link I posted.)The Bradford pear tree usually has a lot of straight branches shooting out from the trunk and gives an overall impression of being stiff and vertical.
Then take a look at the bark. The bark of a cherry tree tends to be smooth and glossy, with short little horizontal marks called lenticels. If you see prominent lenticels, it's almost certainly a cherry. (Although if you don't see them, it's not proof that it's not.)
Re: Pears vs cherries
Date: 2006-04-17 10:35 am (UTC)Re: Pears vs cherries
Date: 2006-04-17 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 03:50 am (UTC)One of the problems with Bradfords, from a landscaping P.O.V. is that they drop their leaves so much later than everything else. I just did the fall cleanup on some Bradfords last week, because they finally dropped them in the snow back in January. We're actually going to be replacing those (and they're not 10 years old) soon, although I do not know with what.
They also have a tendancy to get split by ice and wind, and don't have a long lifespan. (Although city trees in general don't live long, anyway)
Hmm... if those were put in when Davis T opened... then they'd be around 20 years old now, and rapidly on the decline in the coming years. Japanese flowering cherries would be a possible replacement tree.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 03:56 am (UTC)I like the cherry idea, but are there any cultivars w/o fruit? The fruit makes a mess which is downright dangerous with how slippery it can become, which disrecommends fruit trees for over the bike path.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 02:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 11:55 am (UTC)flowering pears
Date: 2008-05-02 05:07 pm (UTC)Choosing urban street trees and examining the history is so interesting. Norway Maples used to be a preferred tree 'till they raised up all the sidewalks.