Middlesex Marquee (again)

[jd-science.livejournal.com]

I just sent the following to the Middlesex Bank. I also e-mailed Rebekah about it. Does anyone else ever notice this trend on the marquee but me? It's annoying and depressing.


Hello-

I sent a comment on June 27, 2006 about the scrolling marquee outside your bank. I have not yet heard a response.

This is what I sent you then:

"I live in the Davis Square area and wanted to express my unhappiness with the new scrolling marquee above your bank. This weekend I was sitting in the square with some friends, and within five minutes we saw the words "death" and "kill" repeated several times. This does not seem appropriate at all for large, bright broadcasting in the middle of Davis Square.

I realize that the marquee was just scrolling news headlines, but I don't believe that news headlines - particularly those types of headlines - are really that important to building a truly informed public and in fact contribute to a destructive social atmosphere. If the marquee must be there (which I don't think it great, but I understand you've probably put a lot of money into it), I'd prefer it just to scroll the time, temperature, and maybe sports scores. And please nothing about death, killing, children being bombed, and so forth. We can get enough of that everywhere else."

Today, August 3, I was eating lunch in the square at around 1 pm, and one right after the other, I saw the following headlines scroll across, multiple times:

Iranian Woman Awaits Death By Stoning
New Surgical Procedure for Incontinence
Woman Afraid of Height Dies in Plane Crash
Israeli Bombing Kills 7
Welcome to Davis Square

There was another headline after the stoning that had something to do with death, but I don't exactly remember what it said.

This hardly seems appropriate to be displayed in large orange letters in the middle of Davis Square. Death, destruction, ridiculousness, and hey! Welcome to Davis!

I went into the bank to ask who to talk to about my issues with the sign, and the tellers told me Mr. Smoliss (?) was in charge. I asked if I could talk to him, and they said, “Well, his office is upstairs.” I wasn’t sure if I was supposed to just walk up and there and knock on the door, so I am writing via the official channel on your website.

At the recent Davis Square Task Force meeting, it was noted that the sign is only allowed, by law, to display the time, temperature, and public service announcements. The president also said he wanted the sign to promote community events and activities.

(for notes, see http://community.livejournal.com/davis_square/565301.html)

It hardly seems that what I saw today is in line with any of this. In addition, after all these useless, dramatic headlines were several about mergers and business acquisitions, also not of local community interest.

I would appreciate a response from you about this problem.

Comments

Re: Not the same.

[komos.livejournal.com]

That's one way to look at it.

Another is to acknowledge that you are making a demand to restrict the flow of information because of your perception of its purpose and because it offends your sensibilities. This is the same approach used by radical fundamentalists to restrict, for instance, the teaching of sex-ed and evolution in schools.

Re: Not the same

[numbersnletters.livejournal.com]

In my opinion, the scrolling sign on top of the Middlesex Bank does not represent "the flow of information". The sign constitutes an invasion into my mental space. I do not agree with your comparison of me to a radical fundamentalist; I don't want to snuff out or make inaccessible the information they display there. The sign is in a public space, and when I am in that public space, my mind ought not to be an open book to whatever the proprietors of the Middlesex Bank want to write in it, via their neon sign.

A neon orange sign is incapable of listening to anyone else's point of view. Much like a radical fundamentalist, the neon orange sign blares on and on and on without stopping, incapable of listening to anyone else, obnoxiously regurgitating only what its programmer has told it to say.

Re: Not the same

[komos.livejournal.com]

You should definitely get together with Rebecca Hagelin for coffee sometime.

Re: Not the same

[numbersnletters.livejournal.com]

whatever

Re: Not the same

[komos.livejournal.com]

How is your position fundamentally different? Hagelin has written extensively about the negative and harmful flow of information and its effect of poisoning our society, and has actively worked to find ways to restrict it in order to protect her children from its deleterious effects. You're advocating restricting a stream of poisonous headlines in order to protect yourself from they're deleterious effects. You are engaging in precisely the same "culture gone mad" justification of censorship, albeit with a different political slant.

Re: Not the same.

[four-thorns.livejournal.com]

"the flow of information"? are you serious? it's a message board, not the new york times. i hardly consider a provider of four-word phrases with no follow-up whatsoever to be a source of information, and if you do, then frankly that's just a sign of how america and the american media has been reduced to a culture of soundbites and flashy graphics at the expense of substance. i don't need a message board to know that people are dying in the middle east, and since it can't go in-depth to tell me anything more about the situation, it's useless as a source of information.

Re: Not the same.

[komos.livejournal.com]

It's one thing to note that the marquee is an eyesore.

It's another thing entirely to claim that a marquee projecting news headlines is a "faceless town crier of doom" and an attempt at "mind control." I'm not making claims as to its effectiveness. I am simply noting that taking issue with scrolling news headlines as some kind of mind poison that affects one's ability to function doesn't stray that far from the "culture gone mad" argument the right uses.

The news as soundbite discussion is something else entirely. Of course, you'll note that there hasn't been a general outcry here about the nigh on useless Metro.

I guess people are to engrossed with the free Sudoku.