Yesterday, I walked down to Davis Square and, being the transportation geek that I am, I naturally watched the traffic to see what people were up to. This is what I noticed:
- A very large percentage of people, if not most, don't actually come to a legal and safe stop at stop signs, stop lines, and even some red lights. (They either blow through them, slow down but don't actually stop long enough to be able to yield to the traffic that has the right of way, or don't stop until they are well into the intersection and block cross-traffic.)
- Some people rely on stop signs, red lights, and crosswalks for safety (specifically, cross-traffic with the right of way - both vehiclular and pedestrian traffic).
- Other people, who believe that stop signs/lines/signals aren't very reliable indicators of safety, are afraid to use the public ways or are reluctant to go when they have the right of way. (Especially those who don't have a couple of tons of metal armor protecting them!)
- Current policing doesn't seem to be making things better, and the problem is rapidly increasing! (I used to walk to school by myself when I was in kindergarden in this area, and these days I imagine that there isn't a single parent around here who would feel safe letting their kid walk to school alone.)
What to do? It seems like we need a solution that combines a realistic understanding of natural human behavior (including inertia, self-centeredness, and self-preservation), real physical and emotional safety, and clearly defined policies/design. Should we stick with the stop signs, lines, and signals, and just spend lots more money on enforcement? Should we try to create new street designs and signs that work better than the ones we have? Should we try to change people's natural behavior by getting them to understand how important it is for them to cooperate with others? The usual solutions that come from traffic engineers, the police, and city hall don't seem to be working for Somerville. So, I'm thinking that the solution needs to come by thinking a bit more "outside the box"... (remember, Davis Square isn't actually a square! :-)
Also, can we learn anything from other parts of the world where traffic does flow well and safely? Or learn from the past, when things were better in Somerville?
- A very large percentage of people, if not most, don't actually come to a legal and safe stop at stop signs, stop lines, and even some red lights. (They either blow through them, slow down but don't actually stop long enough to be able to yield to the traffic that has the right of way, or don't stop until they are well into the intersection and block cross-traffic.)
- Some people rely on stop signs, red lights, and crosswalks for safety (specifically, cross-traffic with the right of way - both vehiclular and pedestrian traffic).
- Other people, who believe that stop signs/lines/signals aren't very reliable indicators of safety, are afraid to use the public ways or are reluctant to go when they have the right of way. (Especially those who don't have a couple of tons of metal armor protecting them!)
- Current policing doesn't seem to be making things better, and the problem is rapidly increasing! (I used to walk to school by myself when I was in kindergarden in this area, and these days I imagine that there isn't a single parent around here who would feel safe letting their kid walk to school alone.)
What to do? It seems like we need a solution that combines a realistic understanding of natural human behavior (including inertia, self-centeredness, and self-preservation), real physical and emotional safety, and clearly defined policies/design. Should we stick with the stop signs, lines, and signals, and just spend lots more money on enforcement? Should we try to create new street designs and signs that work better than the ones we have? Should we try to change people's natural behavior by getting them to understand how important it is for them to cooperate with others? The usual solutions that come from traffic engineers, the police, and city hall don't seem to be working for Somerville. So, I'm thinking that the solution needs to come by thinking a bit more "outside the box"... (remember, Davis Square isn't actually a square! :-)
Also, can we learn anything from other parts of the world where traffic does flow well and safely? Or learn from the past, when things were better in Somerville?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:26 pm (UTC)I'd love to see the city experiment with simply turning off the traffic signal in Davis Square for a month or two, and see if things work better. Not flashing yellow or red, just completely off. It would definitely keep the buses better on schedule.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:26 pm (UTC)...and no, I don't think that turning Davis into a pedestrian only zone is a remotely realistic solution.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:26 pm (UTC)So I aplogize that I don't know what to do about the cars and instead just blew off steam about the cyclists which is not meant to cast aspersion upon *all* cyclists.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:36 pm (UTC)the metro-Boston areaInsert Your Town Name Here suck!As a driver/walker around the square, I have to agree with the sentiment above that cyclists tend to be way more of a problem in terms of not obeying traffic laws. I know the internet is full of "but I'm not one of those cyclists," but I've yet to see evidence of more than a select few law-abiding cyclists every time I'm driving (which, admittedly, is pretty much only on weekends).
Also, ever driven outside of this country? Minor traffic issues in Somerville are a dream compared to many other roads out there.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:50 pm (UTC)I've also heard it told that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (http://www.bostonmpo.org/bostonmpo/index.htm) has funding available to help communities in need of pedestrian planning.
As a sometimes-driver, sometimes-cyclist, and sometimes-pedestrian, I know how easy it is to get angry and generalize the transgressions of one car/bike/ped (whichever modes you AREN'T using). I think any workable solution needs to include clearer signs, formalized planning, and consistent penalties for violators.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:58 pm (UTC)So I'm wondering if there is a solution that would make things smoother and safer for everyone, not just one form of road user. I'm thinking that there must be a more ideal design/policy for dealing with all the diversity in Somerville traffic.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:01 pm (UTC)Please add an ljcut !!!
Date: 2007-01-24 08:07 pm (UTC)Put
<lj-cut text="Read more">
at the end of the first paragraph, and
</lj-cut>
at the end of the article.
Thanks -len
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:07 pm (UTC)Personally, I've always wanted to see what would happen if they just started aggressively ticketing everyone for a while (possibly preceding it by repainting/repairing things and a period of just issuing warnings).
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:09 pm (UTC)When I was riding regularly, I had one too many close calls and decided on better routes. I still drive through, but will often find ways around just so I don't have to guess which entrance is going to spit out a car at an unfortunate moment and cause a white-knuckle moment.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:11 pm (UTC)i'll stop for pedestrians...i simply don't do it as much when they aren't paying attention.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:17 pm (UTC)http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/04/ntraffic04.xml
I've also read that in other countries, they have yield signs where we have stop signs. Coming to a dead stop in a motor vehicle or a bicycle is often not necessary to operate safely, as can be shown with the way that many people drive.
I hate how there is so much focus by drivers on making the green light, instead of actually paying attention and interacting with other users of the road. I wonder if it would be possible to design roads in the Boston area that encourage slow steady speeds and force people to yield to others when necessary.
An example... Mass Ave in Cambridge is such an inefficient road. Traffic speeds up to the next red light and then sits there, often for much of the cycle where there are no vehicles or pedestrians in the other directions. This would be much better if there was a way to have a slow steady speed. Motorists and bicyclists would have to yield to pedestrians and the slower automobile speed would make the road much more easily shared by bicyclists. Of course, this would require everyone to actually respect each other and be nice. Are Bostonians too self-centered for this to actually work? Who knows!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:20 pm (UTC)