Yesterday, I walked down to Davis Square and, being the transportation geek that I am, I naturally watched the traffic to see what people were up to. This is what I noticed:
- A very large percentage of people, if not most, don't actually come to a legal and safe stop at stop signs, stop lines, and even some red lights. (They either blow through them, slow down but don't actually stop long enough to be able to yield to the traffic that has the right of way, or don't stop until they are well into the intersection and block cross-traffic.)
- Some people rely on stop signs, red lights, and crosswalks for safety (specifically, cross-traffic with the right of way - both vehiclular and pedestrian traffic).
- Other people, who believe that stop signs/lines/signals aren't very reliable indicators of safety, are afraid to use the public ways or are reluctant to go when they have the right of way. (Especially those who don't have a couple of tons of metal armor protecting them!)
- Current policing doesn't seem to be making things better, and the problem is rapidly increasing! (I used to walk to school by myself when I was in kindergarden in this area, and these days I imagine that there isn't a single parent around here who would feel safe letting their kid walk to school alone.)
What to do? It seems like we need a solution that combines a realistic understanding of natural human behavior (including inertia, self-centeredness, and self-preservation), real physical and emotional safety, and clearly defined policies/design. Should we stick with the stop signs, lines, and signals, and just spend lots more money on enforcement? Should we try to create new street designs and signs that work better than the ones we have? Should we try to change people's natural behavior by getting them to understand how important it is for them to cooperate with others? The usual solutions that come from traffic engineers, the police, and city hall don't seem to be working for Somerville. So, I'm thinking that the solution needs to come by thinking a bit more "outside the box"... (remember, Davis Square isn't actually a square! :-)
Also, can we learn anything from other parts of the world where traffic does flow well and safely? Or learn from the past, when things were better in Somerville?
- A very large percentage of people, if not most, don't actually come to a legal and safe stop at stop signs, stop lines, and even some red lights. (They either blow through them, slow down but don't actually stop long enough to be able to yield to the traffic that has the right of way, or don't stop until they are well into the intersection and block cross-traffic.)
- Some people rely on stop signs, red lights, and crosswalks for safety (specifically, cross-traffic with the right of way - both vehiclular and pedestrian traffic).
- Other people, who believe that stop signs/lines/signals aren't very reliable indicators of safety, are afraid to use the public ways or are reluctant to go when they have the right of way. (Especially those who don't have a couple of tons of metal armor protecting them!)
- Current policing doesn't seem to be making things better, and the problem is rapidly increasing! (I used to walk to school by myself when I was in kindergarden in this area, and these days I imagine that there isn't a single parent around here who would feel safe letting their kid walk to school alone.)
What to do? It seems like we need a solution that combines a realistic understanding of natural human behavior (including inertia, self-centeredness, and self-preservation), real physical and emotional safety, and clearly defined policies/design. Should we stick with the stop signs, lines, and signals, and just spend lots more money on enforcement? Should we try to create new street designs and signs that work better than the ones we have? Should we try to change people's natural behavior by getting them to understand how important it is for them to cooperate with others? The usual solutions that come from traffic engineers, the police, and city hall don't seem to be working for Somerville. So, I'm thinking that the solution needs to come by thinking a bit more "outside the box"... (remember, Davis Square isn't actually a square! :-)
Also, can we learn anything from other parts of the world where traffic does flow well and safely? Or learn from the past, when things were better in Somerville?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:"Visual speed bumps"
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-25 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:26 pm (UTC)I'd love to see the city experiment with simply turning off the traffic signal in Davis Square for a month or two, and see if things work better. Not flashing yellow or red, just completely off. It would definitely keep the buses better on schedule.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:26 pm (UTC)...and no, I don't think that turning Davis into a pedestrian only zone is a remotely realistic solution.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 10:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:26 pm (UTC)So I aplogize that I don't know what to do about the cars and instead just blew off steam about the cyclists which is not meant to cast aspersion upon *all* cyclists.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(Sometimes people can be too helpful)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:36 pm (UTC)the metro-Boston areaInsert Your Town Name Here suck!As a driver/walker around the square, I have to agree with the sentiment above that cyclists tend to be way more of a problem in terms of not obeying traffic laws. I know the internet is full of "but I'm not one of those cyclists," but I've yet to see evidence of more than a select few law-abiding cyclists every time I'm driving (which, admittedly, is pretty much only on weekends).
Also, ever driven outside of this country? Minor traffic issues in Somerville are a dream compared to many other roads out there.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Damning with faint praise?
From:I want your opinions!
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:I want to see more penguins!
From:(no subject)
From:X-games underground
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 07:50 pm (UTC)I've also heard it told that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (http://www.bostonmpo.org/bostonmpo/index.htm) has funding available to help communities in need of pedestrian planning.
As a sometimes-driver, sometimes-cyclist, and sometimes-pedestrian, I know how easy it is to get angry and generalize the transgressions of one car/bike/ped (whichever modes you AREN'T using). I think any workable solution needs to include clearer signs, formalized planning, and consistent penalties for violators.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Please add an ljcut !!!
Date: 2007-01-24 08:07 pm (UTC)Put
<lj-cut text="Read more">
at the end of the first paragraph, and
</lj-cut>
at the end of the article.
Thanks -len
Re: Please add an ljcut !!!
Date: 2007-01-24 10:02 pm (UTC)Re: Please add an ljcut !!!
From:Re: Please add an ljcut !!!
From:Re: Please add an ljcut !!!
From:please don't lj-cut this
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:07 pm (UTC)Personally, I've always wanted to see what would happen if they just started aggressively ticketing everyone for a while (possibly preceding it by repainting/repairing things and a period of just issuing warnings).
Agressive enforcement in problem areas
Date: 2007-01-24 08:47 pm (UTC)The place I feel most strongly about that is at the intersection of Packard and Powderhouse. I walk through that intersection only say, four times a week. Each and every time, I note at least three cars that could be ticketed before I manage to make it across the street. And that's 12 citations in like 15 minutes of exposure total... Imagine if they actually stationed a couple of guys there for a week. The city would be rolling in money, and people might start paying attention to the signs again, just in case.
Re: Agressive enforcement in problem areas
From:Re: Agressive enforcement in problem areas
From:Re: Agressive enforcement in problem areas
From:Big Brother cameras
From:Re: Big Brother cameras
From:Re: Agressive enforcement in problem areas
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:08 pm (UTC)It
Date: 2007-01-24 09:32 pm (UTC)Basically, it could be worsee, but it could also be a hell of a lot better!
Re: It
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:11 pm (UTC)i'll stop for pedestrians...i simply don't do it as much when they aren't paying attention.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:58 pm (UTC)Thus, I end up crossing and getting glared at by drivers waiting at the red light at the now empty crosswalk. I admit I feel somewhat guilty about that, but the alternative is to trust the average driver on that street with my life *knowing* they've proved themself untrustworthy again and again...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:17 pm (UTC)http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/04/ntraffic04.xml
I've also read that in other countries, they have yield signs where we have stop signs. Coming to a dead stop in a motor vehicle or a bicycle is often not necessary to operate safely, as can be shown with the way that many people drive.
I hate how there is so much focus by drivers on making the green light, instead of actually paying attention and interacting with other users of the road. I wonder if it would be possible to design roads in the Boston area that encourage slow steady speeds and force people to yield to others when necessary.
An example... Mass Ave in Cambridge is such an inefficient road. Traffic speeds up to the next red light and then sits there, often for much of the cycle where there are no vehicles or pedestrians in the other directions. This would be much better if there was a way to have a slow steady speed. Motorists and bicyclists would have to yield to pedestrians and the slower automobile speed would make the road much more easily shared by bicyclists. Of course, this would require everyone to actually respect each other and be nice. Are Bostonians too self-centered for this to actually work? Who knows!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:36 pm (UTC)Better roads and more space would help for sure, but human nature is tough to battle.
Argh.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 08:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 09:10 pm (UTC)I think there are several things at work here, some of them which can be regulated and some of which just require good behavior.
Highland: Making the left lane left turn only would allow people to enter onto Elm without waiting for the one fellow to go forward through the square and stop blocking the turnoff. Remove the closest few spaces of parking in the right lane to allow right turners to make it onto College Ave without waiting for the light. Add crosswalk flag (as in Arlington) on both cross-walks to make drivers more aware.
Russel St: Remove lights at Summer and Elm. There's not very much traffic and a LOT of waiting.
JP Licks triangle: Ticket bikers who flagrantly disobey the rules.
Elm St: Pedestrians walk anywhere (even when crosswalks occur at least every block) and cars and trucks double park. Gah!
That's a start at least...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 09:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-24 10:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-25 01:44 am (UTC)http://www.contextsensitivesolutions.org/content/case_studies/davis-square-somerville/
talks about why and how Davis Square is configured the way it is.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-25 05:07 pm (UTC)I'm also wondering if there are simply too many streets open to through traffic. I was recently reading a book by a psychologist from Harvard about how too many options actually makes us crazy, the more options we feel forced to choose from, the more psychotic we get, especially when we have to make the choice in a very limited amount of time. So, maybe removing some of the vehicular left turn options (Highland to Day and Holland to College) might help things move more smoothly.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-25 02:50 pm (UTC)Pedestrian safety committee
Date: 2007-01-25 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 09:41 pm (UTC)- raised crosswalks (like Columbia Street in Cambridge), to serve both as speed bumps and to make pedestrians easier to see
- aggressively ticket double-parking, especially commercial vehicles. I think this is the only ticketing that would have a deterrent effect, because it is the most likely to catch repeat players. So many cars go through Davis, there is such a high turnover of local residents, and it is so incredibly confusing the first few times through, that it seems unfair to ticket ordinary drivers. Double parking slows down traffic, makes it behave erratically to avoid the unexpected obstacles, and worst of all makes it hard to see pedestrians. We have these nice, wide crosswalk entrances ("neckdowns"?) that in theory provide a buffer between parked cars and the line of sight to pedestrians, but double parking destroys that benefit.
- Make it easier for people who do not want to go through Davis at all to avoid it. The first things I would try are making Willow two-way traffic its entire length (and putting a light at the intersection with Elm), and just plain keeping Winter street free of potholes. This really requires a study of where traffic is coming from and going to first.
- Get a bus system that more people actually are willing to use, so that there is less reason to drive to Davis and try to park. I don't know much about the particular buses in the square, but the usual complaints about MBTA buses are that they are infrequent, unreliable, and not worth the fare.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-27 03:36 pm (UTC)Brilliant.
Now that I live in Ball Square it's almost impossible to drive/bike to Porter without going through Davis -- I know no one want traffic cutting through their neighborhoods but not to have *any* route is absurd. (Particularly when there *is* a direct route in the opposite direction.) Once I get off maternity leave my shortest-distance bike route to work involves going through Porter, and I cannot figure out a way to navigate that legally and still exit Porter where I need to be, and the roads keep gravitationally attracting me toward Davis...
I know it's a confluence of major roads, but the square itself is not suited to through traffic.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-29 03:38 pm (UTC)Here is a good link on that. It is called: Traffic Calming 101
http://www.pps.org/info/placemakingtools/casesforplaces/livememtraffic