The Worst News Day Ever
Mar. 27th, 2007 02:18 pmI was so sad to read the earlier post about La Contessa's closing and I was writing a friend about it and she pointed out this recent story about McIntyre & Moore:
http://somervillenews.typepad.com/the_somerville_news/2007/03/is_the_writing_.html
http://somervillenews.typepad.com/the_somerville_news/2007/03/is_the_writing_.html
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 07:03 pm (UTC)I certainly hope they don't close. It is a treasure trove in there.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 07:35 pm (UTC)But Mac&Moore is where I go to dig for old gems. I don't usually find inscribed books in the HBS used section; Mac&Moore can find treats.
What I guess is that Mac&Moore is perceived as just a regular used bookstore, and their purpose is a bit more focused, and I can see people being disappointed when they realize this. Unless they're the kind of people who go "Cool!" when they realize this.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 07:07 pm (UTC):-)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 07:00 pm (UTC)Not a Bookstore
Date: 2007-03-27 08:09 pm (UTC)Re: Not a Bookstore
Date: 2007-03-27 08:17 pm (UTC)Re: Not a Bookstore
Date: 2007-03-27 08:31 pm (UTC)Re: Not a Bookstore
Date: 2007-03-27 08:35 pm (UTC)Re: Not a Bookstore
Date: 2007-04-09 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 02:33 pm (UTC)Goodwill is a sad book place because they are so mistreated. I want to take all those books piled several feet deep in bins and carefully arrange them on bookcases and pet them to make them feel better. Perhaps I should volunteer...
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 07:42 pm (UTC)But while I think some of those complaints may be legit, I also sincerely doubt that they're why the store's having so much trouble. I wonder if it has anything to do with it at all. If their staff was always friendly, and they carried more trade books, and lowered their prices, I bet they'd still be losing money... just because so many other bookstores are suffering from the exact same problem. It's happening all over the place. I don't necessarily know the reasons why, but I'd guess the single biggest reason is the internet.
If I were to make a customer-service related suggestion, it would be about taking bags into the store. (NB -- haven't been in there recently, for all I know the policy has changed.) I totally understand why they don't want people taking bags into a store that sells items as valuable and stealable as some of their rarer books. On the other hand, when I'm out shopping, I tend not to go in there because I have several bags and don't want to have to check them. In the article, they mention "convenience" and staying open later to be as convenient as possible; I'm sure it would be a lot more convenient if people could take bags in and make it one more stop on a big shopping trip. Is the added customer convenience worth what they might lose in theft? I don't know. Maybe not. I've never run a bookstore, just worked in them.
I'd really hate for Davis to lose its only bookstore, not to mention another landmark. (I really wish we had a bookstore that sold a wider selection of used trade books, too. From the article, it sounded like that would actually help M&M's business, not hurt it.)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 02:30 pm (UTC)This isn't meant to be snarky: I actually want to know why you see it as a negative.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 04:13 pm (UTC)Of course, there have been times when I was so tired and my bags were so heavy that I really *wanted* to put them down (and have been annoyed, in other stores, that I couldn't!). It also depends on whether I want to spend a long time browsing (in which case I probably do want to stash my bags) or just quickly check for something (in which case it slows me down).
In any case, I'm not trying to criticize, I'd just personally prefer not to have to bother. But they're not as bad as the Grolier Poetry Book Shop was, where the owner thoroughly drove bookish me and my bookish friends away because she was so hostile -- she was rude, she wouldn't let me look at books around a corner because it was out of her direct line of sight, she searched one of my friend's bags before we left even though we had purchased things -- it was insulting and extremely counterproductive. (What if there had been something around that corner I wanted to buy?)
In both cases I understand why they're like that. The lady at Grolier probably had to deal with rampant theft of expensive stuff by Harvard students over the decades, leaving her understandably bitter and suspicious. On the other hand, I just couldn't be surprised when she finally had to close her doors, as much of a landmark as the place was. I'm sure the internet had more to do with it than poor customer service, but her actively driving away anybody who looked like a student can't have helped, either.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 04:51 pm (UTC)I have never gotten attitude from Mac&Moore. The staff there have always seemed to me mostly to be tired or depressed. I have never gotten attitude from the Diesel, either, so sometimes I wonder if I'm just missing something. I did get attitude from Sagra over the weekend, though!
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 04:58 pm (UTC)I've both gotten attitude at M&M, and met really nice friendly people who made me smile and/or laugh. Never gotten attitude at Diesel that I can recall -- always friendly, smiling & helpful service.
I can believe that some customers have occasionally encountered rude service at Diesel (even though I've never seen it), because it can happen anywhere every once in a while -- but I also don't believe it for a second whenever somebody claims to have been discriminated against at Diesel because they "looked straight." What rubbish. That reminds me of the way people used to claim, when they came to eat at the dining hall in my rather bohemian creative arts dormitory in college, that they were discriminated against because they "looked preppy." Give me a break.
It may have ever only been trolls making that claim here, anyway. (About Diesel, I mean. Don't think anybody's ever complained about my college dormitory here.)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 08:04 pm (UTC)I forgot how nice it was to have a cheerful, grassroots, locally-owned bookstore to browse in between errands until Porter Square Books opened up.
I love a used boostore but I think M&M is surely my least-loved. I still miss the Book Cellar in Porter Square :)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 11:27 pm (UTC)It's not the bag check; it's that the staff seems to go out of their way to be unpleasant to you when you check your bag and are especially surly if you pick up your bag without buying anything.
I guess Harvard Book Store will be next. There's really not much left in the Boston area, compared to what was here five years ago. Just this week I found out that Quantum Books' branch in Waltham (formerly Softpro) is gone, leaving one lone tech book store where there once were four in the metro area. And Quantum seems to be shifting focus to gifts rather than books.
I wonder every day why I'm still paying high rents to live here. And I don't live in Davis; I live in one of the "cheaper" suburbs.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 08:09 pm (UTC)If I was to make one suggestion though, it would be to hire a fiction buyer and put a little more effort into that area of the store. The "scholarly bookstore" tag isn't going to suffer if they make a little more effort to stock some slightly more mainstream selections and fiction is much more of an impulse buy than a book on literary theory or Central Asian history. I've occasionally wondered why they bother with an science fiction or mystery section at all given how little their stock seems to have changed in the last ten years.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 02:33 am (UTC)I certainly wouldn't think less of them if they pandered to the masses a little bit, as long as the scholarly selection was still satisfactory!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-09 12:24 am (UTC)I am on the side of those who hate the snobbery. I've been in a few times over the years, but they actually make a used bookstore unfriendly and unappealing. I have no idea how they do it -- I've never disliked ANY other used bookstore that I can think of.
That said, my mother once found a very rare book on Hungarian folk-dancing there, and she was quite overjoyed.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 09:19 pm (UTC)The Idea of McIntyre & Moore is actually better than M&M
Date: 2007-03-27 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 09:51 pm (UTC)Maybe they should open a coffee bar in the front... ;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 10:31 pm (UTC)Saddest quote ever: “I would like it (Davis Square) to be more of a destination for weird retail instead of just restaurants." So disturbing that a bookstore is now considered "weird retail".
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 11:18 pm (UTC)And wow are people being bitchy in the comments to the news article. I realize that the type of stuff that M&M sells isn't for everyone, but they've made themselves unique by having specific standards on what they stock. I've always found their prices very fair. I wonder if they're listing their inventory on the various online services as well -- if they aren't taking advantage of the larger bookshopping world, that could hurt.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 03:38 am (UTC)I brought the books to M&M blindly, waited around while a girl checked everything, and was told only 5 titles she didn't want. The best part (for both of us) was when she said I could expect to receive about $40 in cash or about twice that amount in credit. I, not wanting to make money off used books of mine I had no use for, gladly accepted the credit and she gladly wrote me a receipt.
I haven't used the credit yet. I suppose the expiration is ticking...
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 10:21 pm (UTC)I buy there occasionally, and have never had problems with staff. I want bookstore (and all retail, for that matter) staff to leave me the hell alone until I ask for something, and they do a great job of that, and are polite and civil otherwise. The long hours are good too, especially as compared to most of the rest of the retail in the Square, which seems to be mostly closed by the time I get home at 7 or 8 on weeknights.
The only thing I would change would be to do something about shelving, categorizing, etc. It's pretty easy to have your eyes glaze over in there, because it's just booksbooksbooks as far as the eye can see, with not much to break it up. Maybe some of the staff-recommendation sorts of models that other stores use? Especially as arcane as a lot of the stuff they carry is, it'd be great as an interested amateur/layman to have some guidance. And while the taxonomist in me appreciates the fine-grained categorization, stuff doesn't often seem to be filed where I would intuitively think it would be, or is filed inconsistently(Some Latin American fiction in its own section, some in general Fiction, that kind of thing.) Minor quibbles, but those are probably the main reasons I don't shop there more than I already do.
But yeah, this is probably more a case of this neighborhood being a victim of its own success, and of the economics of the book business than of anything M&M has done wrong. I hope they can stick it out, but I've seen this story play out over and over again with bookstores I liked, and I know how it usually ends.