[identity profile] plumtreeblossom.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] davis_square
Does anyone have a link or knowledge about Somerville's new garbage laws regarding things having to be in a trash barrel with a lid? I'm doing spring cleaning, and already I have much more than will fit in the house's barrels. Without a car I can't take it to a dump, and some of it is perishable stuff that will stink if left til the following week...

Thanks for any guidance.

Date: 2007-03-31 09:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chenoameg.livejournal.com
It still needs to be in barrels.

Date: 2007-03-31 09:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] surrealestate.livejournal.com
Sorry, I must have misunderstood the regs. I got them from the source: http://crm.4gov.com/SOMERVILLEMA/FILEXFER/issue_12612/Ord2006Trash.pdf
But they aren't particularly clear anywhere I can find on the proper way to handle the very occasional situation of having more trash than barrels, beyond that it will be treated as bulk trash.

I *was* told earlier this year by someone on 311 that additional bags could go out on the curb on trash day, but that does actually seem to be the case.

Date: 2007-03-31 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chenoameg.livejournal.com
Nope, the regs define bulk trash as specific items, not an abundance of trash.

(For that matter the regs also set a limit on the volume of trash barrels -- 32 gallons. No one seems to be taking that into account, though.)

That being said, there's the letter of the law, and then there's the purpose of the law.

The primary reason for these regulations is to reduce the amount of rodent food available. The city is highly unlikely to ticket every non-compliant household every week. What seems more likely to me is that buildings that repeatedly ignore the ordinance will be noticed and fined.

So the right thing to do is to make a good faith effort when you have an unusually large quantity of trash. Put all of the food trash in barrels. Keep some of the clean garbage inside until trash day, etc. In my opinion if you make a good faith effort to follow the regs you should have nothing to worry about.

Date: 2007-03-31 09:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] surrealestate.livejournal.com
Nope, the regs define bulk trash as specific items, not an abundance of trash.

If you look at page 4 of the regs, section (h)(3), it notes that nonregulation barrels or any other unapproved containers will be treated as bulk items and disposed of as such. Since they define an approved container, that seems to mean that trash in trash bags outside a proper barrel would be considered bulk items.

Date: 2007-03-31 09:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chenoameg.livejournal.com
Which contradicts (h)(1) on the same page ("shall cause the refuse to be placed in authorized refuse receptacles."), but I see your point.

Sorry for bickering about it.

I'm usually better at close reading than this, but every time I've tackled these regs they've sent me in circles.

Date: 2007-03-31 09:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] surrealestate.livejournal.com
Oh, I didn't think we were bickering -- just both being kind of amused while navigating the labyrinth of government regulations.

Perhaps, taking a cue from them, we too should have begun with two and a half pages defining any word we might use that could be confusing, such as "leaves" (b)(11). :)

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78 910
11121314151617
181920212223 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 04:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios