election tomorrow
May. 14th, 2007 12:09 pmTomorrow, Tuesday May 15th, is the general election for the open seat on the Somerville Board of Aldermen. The two top candidates from last month's primary, Marty Martinez and Jack Connolly will be on the ballot.
Polls are open 7am - 8pm, and you can find your polling place at WhereDoIVoteMA.com. All Somerville voters can vote in this election (election info from the city).
Many people who voted in the primary will forget to vote again tomorrow, so both candidates need some new voters as well as many of their supporters from April as they can get. If you're supporting Jack, this is your chance to make a comeback; if you're supporting Marty, don't assume he'll win. Vote!
Polls are open 7am - 8pm, and you can find your polling place at WhereDoIVoteMA.com. All Somerville voters can vote in this election (election info from the city).
Many people who voted in the primary will forget to vote again tomorrow, so both candidates need some new voters as well as many of their supporters from April as they can get. If you're supporting Jack, this is your chance to make a comeback; if you're supporting Marty, don't assume he'll win. Vote!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 07:45 pm (UTC)As far as the California thing goes, you're changing the subject without answering the question. If you went to another country (any country, you can pick), how long would you need to live there before you felt like you should be able to vote in their elections?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 08:13 pm (UTC)I'm not sure how I'm being intellectually dishonest. I'm just trying to understand your position.
I think what you're saying (and feel free to clarify) is that you think people who come to Somerville, even if they're here for just one day, and say that they should be able to vote if they hit the 30 day registration deadline. But if you went to another country, you wouldn't expect to be able to vote in their elections even if you were there for a year.
Is that what you believe? That you're willing to give out rights in your own country that you wouldn't expect if you were in another country?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 12:59 am (UTC)If I actually lived in France, made France my home, participated in the community, paid taxes to France, then I would want to vote in at least some of the elections. I wouldn't expect to, since everyone makes their laws as they see fit. But I would definitely want to.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 06:15 pm (UTC)Also, you avoided my question. Why discriminate against someone simply because they happened to live outside of the US before they came to Somerville?
And to at least partially answer your question, yes I would expect to be able to vote in local elections in Canada if I moved there, since that is exactly what would happen. I don't know about Africa or England, but I expect that they might have similar policies as Canada.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 06:32 pm (UTC)If you're going to propose a change to the system, I'd like to know what your proposed system is. Personally, I'd keep the current system but make changes to the immigration laws to make the process of becoming a citizen faster than it is now.
I'm not advocating discriminating against anyone (pretty much all I've done here is ask questions), but I'm trying to understand what your position is.
And to at least partially answer your question, yes I would expect to be able to vote in local elections in Canada if I moved there, since that is exactly what would happen.
Based on what? From my Googling all the sources that I can find say you have to be a citizen (of Canada) to vote in Canada.
I don't know about Africa or England, but I expect that they might have similar policies as Canada.
In which case only citizens could vote. There are places that allow immigrants to vote, but you haven't hit one yet (AFAIK).
I don't (and haven't) objected to allowing immigrants to vote (again, I've only committed the thought crime of asking questions about it), but I would like to see a concrete proposal on the issue from the people who are advocating it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 06:45 pm (UTC)And as for a proposed policy, it depends on who you ask. Cambridge has one. My own policy would be more indepth. I'd let anyone vote who wanted to, but only if they participated in some kind of community program and/or took a class on Somerville issues, so that they at least had some solid basis for making good decisions about Somerville issues.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 07:14 pm (UTC)Do you have a pointer for that? I Googled "Canadian landed immigrants" to see if that got a different result, and it didn't. And they call them "Permanent Residents" now, just like we do (if you can believe Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permanent_resident_(Canada)
According to that page, Permanent/Landed Residents can't vote.
I'd let anyone vote who wanted to, but only if they participated in some kind of community program and/or took a class on Somerville issues, so that they at least had some solid basis for making good decisions about Somerville issues.
Do you have to pass the class, or just attend it?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 07:15 pm (UTC)You're aware that this is the kind of thing you have to do to become a US citizen, right?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-14 09:05 pm (UTC)http://www.sos.nh.gov/vote.htm
"You may register as soon as you move into your new community.
HOW TO REGISTER
1) Apply to your town or city clerk's office. You will be required to fill out a standard voter registration form and will be required to show proof of age, citizenship and domicile.
[and]
3) Qualified individuals may also register to vote at the polling place on election day at all elections. You will be asked to show proof of age, citizenship, and domicile."
I'm still not sure how I'm intellectually dishonest. Dishonest implies lying, but I only asked questions and didn't misrepresent any facts (as you did). So is that like a thought crime? I don't think the way you do, so that's intellectually dishonest?