[identity profile] enochs-fable.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] davis_square
If you're taking your adorable chocolate lab out for a stroll on the bike-path on a lovely Sunday afternoon, please protect your dog and other people using the path and keep him on a leash.

I witnessed an almost-accident at close range as the dog ambled from one side of the path to another, forcing a bicyclist to slam on his brakes and stop hard to avoid hitting him.

He doesn't know any better, he's just a dog, doing what dogs do. You, on the other hand, should.

Date: 2008-07-14 07:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuns.livejournal.com
There are several stories in this discussion about people who let their dogs run free in places where those pets run in front of moving bikes etc. This endangers both the pet and the people around them. Not a leap at all, simply a reference to the subject of this discussion. Having unleashed dogs on the bike path endangers both the dogs and the other people on the path.

As for who gets to decide what's irresponsible: there are laws in place that define this. I am simply calling for those laws to be enforced.

Turns out that owning a dog without a license results in hefty fines, not euthanasia. Mentioning euthanasia was alarmist and unfair.

As for moving away: I never advocated making people move away. I advocated tickets and license revocations, in that order. You leapt right to the revocations, and started this whole discussion of forcing people out of their homes, which was also alarmist and unfair.

I never suggested that people should be forced to move away. However, if people really feel that their dog needs more free-roaming space than is available where they live, and they really DO love the dog as much as they SAY they love the dog, they should move away by choice, to provide for the basic needs of their loved one. Alternately, they could find a nice home for their loved one, with a family that can provide for its basic needs.

Instead, people simply ignore the safety regulations that call for leashing their dog, which puts the dog into situations where it can be injured or killed, situations that also endanger other people. That doesn't sound like love to me.


Date: 2008-07-14 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] buckturgidsen.livejournal.com
Oh I see. So the city revokes my dog license but allows me to keep my now-unlicensed dog. That sounds very well thought out. And when you repeatedly said that irresponsible dog-owners shouldn't be allowed to have dogs, I see now that I should have read this as meaning "irresponsible dog-owners shouldn't be allowed to have LICENSED dogs". I get it now. Sorry to be so alarmist.

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 03:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios