dangerous intersection
Mar. 16th, 2009 10:37 amSo, there was Yet Another bad car accident on the corner of Powder House Blvd and Packard Ave yesterday. Including a baby in a carseat in the car that ended up on the lawn of 125 Powder House. This intersection, I believe, is too dangerous to have a blinky light any longer. People routinely cruise down Powder House at 45 mph or more and cannot stop for pedestrians or turning cars.
To whom does one write a letter about this? I really feel that a real, three light traffic light is finally called for there, at least so that one can push the button for a walk. Even a blinky light like they have on Rt. 16 so that you *can* push the button for a walk would be an improvement, but wouldn't solve the issue of people turning off or onto Packard, which people do pretty frequently.
Thoughts, dslj?
To whom does one write a letter about this? I really feel that a real, three light traffic light is finally called for there, at least so that one can push the button for a walk. Even a blinky light like they have on Rt. 16 so that you *can* push the button for a walk would be an improvement, but wouldn't solve the issue of people turning off or onto Packard, which people do pretty frequently.
Thoughts, dslj?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 01:20 am (UTC)If you're in the rotary, there are directions that you have a flashing yellow to exit the rotary onto a street, and directions that you don't. Again, if someone presses a walk button, these turn solid red for some appropriate set of crosswalks.
but I know that because I've lived right off it for 10+ years; I constantly watch people do stupid things in that rotary. My own personal pet peeve is that when the crosswalk lights have just changed back from solid red and I'm in the rotary, the state reverts to me having a flashing yellow and the traffic entering from the road having a flashing red/stop sign. Thus "yield to traffic in rotary" applies to them, but they never do.