Somerville Theater = AMC Lowes Harvard Sq?
Sep. 3rd, 2009 01:20 pmI'm not sure I understand the Somerville Theater strategy. They almost always have the same movies as the AMC Lowes in Harvard Sq. For example, this week:
http://calendar.boston.com/somerville-ma/venues/show/1135016-somerville-theatre
http://calendar.boston.com/cambridge-ma/venues/show/22172-amc-loews-harvard-square
I know that the ST has special events and all, but wouldn't it be a better strategy to do what the Kendall theater does? Try to differentiate themselves from the big chains to get the special artsy/geeky crowd in the area?... I'm sure there are issues I'm not aware of, but it seems to me they are not exploiting their niche.
PS: Check out the really fascinating explanation for this pattern by the man himself, svilletheatre , near the bottom of the thread.
http://calendar.boston.com/somerville-ma/venues/show/1135016-somerville-theatre
http://calendar.boston.com/cambridge-ma/venues/show/22172-amc-loews-harvard-square
I know that the ST has special events and all, but wouldn't it be a better strategy to do what the Kendall theater does? Try to differentiate themselves from the big chains to get the special artsy/geeky crowd in the area?... I'm sure there are issues I'm not aware of, but it seems to me they are not exploiting their niche.
PS: Check out the really fascinating explanation for this pattern by the man himself, svilletheatre , near the bottom of the thread.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 01:26 am (UTC)However, Fresh Pond (now under Entertainment Cinemas) and the Kendall still block us. With some of the very limited releases Kendall gets, this kind of makes sense - if you are only going to do one engagement in the whole Boston market, choose the big art-house. However, and especially with the lack of art product today, I wish we could play with them on the bigger movies, like when they played "No Country For Old Men" for 18 weeks and wouldn't let us play along. The Fresh Pond issue is less vexing (we really don't need to play, say, Final Destination XVI) but actually cripples the Capitol Theatre more so, since it remains 2nd run. We'd really love to play kids movies there on a first-run basis, but Fresh Pond gets 'em first. Even though, despite our lower ticket price, we often outgross them, the studios do not want to upset that situation. I'm sure someday Fresh Pond will close and that situation will change, so we are just biding our time and slowly upgrading the theater there.
So at Somerville, finally I had some audiences. We finally made some money, which I have poured back into it tenfold. Between renovations in 2006 and this summer, I think I have spent about half a million bucks just trying to get us up to speed and keep the old gal all shiny and more historic. I've programmed some midnight and double feature repertory stuff on occasion, and while fun, that kind of stuff barely breaks even, though I hope to do more again soon. But I DO try to balance out the schedule, using what movies are available to me. I don't want to be just another multiplex, which is why when I have an open screen I'll play a second run film like "Food, Inc" or "Moon" etc. Sometimes I am forced to carry something longer than I want to (first run has some obligations like minimum engagements) and don't have a spare screen but I do try and take some of the better 2nd run off of the Kendall. But my obligation is to keep that theater open and alive, and let me tell you, it is "The Simpsons" and "The Dark Knight" and "The Hangover" that are paying the bills, not the "Food, Inc" of the world.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 01:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 03:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 04:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 04:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 10:48 am (UTC)Friends of mine are spitballing a non-profit "film education" type thing, and one of the problems is making the financials work.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 06:24 pm (UTC)We're just wrapping up the installation of a new projection booth and system in the main theater this month (digital sound, and 70mm capability! woo!) that will enable us to play archival prints and makes running repertory/single showing titles easier (using a changeover two-projector system) and so I am hoping that next year I can program some classic titles around the first runs and live events in there on weekdays.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 06:49 pm (UTC)I'll pass it on.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 03:36 pm (UTC)I am rueful that home video led to the demise of the repertory theater, because since the mid-90s, Videosmith, City Video, two branches of Hollywood Express, and the video store in the Garage have all gone out of business. But even in those days, when I haunted both the video stores and the repertories, the repertories filled a niche that remains unfilled even today.
For instance, a widescreen Prospero's Books is unavailable on any home format. The same goes for the short films of Jay Rosenblatt. Susan Streitfeld's Female Perversions. The other day I was looking for the films of Susan Sontag, and while those are probably completely unavailable, the only chance I will have to see them will be if a repertory theater digs up an old print. Not even Netflix is likely to carry these any time soon. But now we're getting to a serious niche market, and even the Brattle, which makes an effort, has to run things like Drag Me Back To Hell to make that kind of thing possible.
Anyway, the Somerville is a multifarious, chimerical glory, and if I can help it to survive in any way, I will.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 06:19 pm (UTC)The Brattle is truly something rare and special. They are fighting the good fight when it comes to programming, and the people there really care about their mission. We are all lucky to have it nearby. We'd had a few chats with them when they began to go forward with attaining their beer and wine license this year - they wanted to know how we did it, our challenges, our rules, etc. - and I was happy to oblige. Someone said to me, "why would you help them if it competes with something that you do?" I said, "it's the freaking Brattle, man! Everyone should be helping them!" Plus it's not like we're playing the same thing. You could skip film school and just go to the Brattle for 4 years and you'd have a better education in the end.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 06:48 pm (UTC)That's so depressing. My hope was that the prints were still out there and it was just a matter of venue, that is, finding a market. But it sounds like the upshot is that plenty of films just aren't available, anywhere, in any format.
But you know what, if that's the situation, I would trade the possibility of real film prints for mere availability. Give me a reasonably hi-def digital video projection on a decently sized screen, and I'll be satisfied. But with some movies, I can't even do that at 480p on my home setup. Some kind of digital distribution would be so much cheaper than film prints... but no one's going to look into it if the audience isn't already there.
My personal dream is to curate a once-a-week film series that doesn't expect to get that much more than twenty people per screening. I know nothing about the economics of it, but if there were a digital distribution system, maybe there would be a chance that it could work.
That's pretty much what I did! :)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 07:54 pm (UTC)