The Bowl and Board space
Oct. 8th, 2009 05:25 pmSo I was just thinking, is there anything that we can do as a community to prevent the landlords from charging an exorbitant amount of rent for that space?
I had posted yesterday that the space is on loopnet.com for 20k and people started tweeting about it, everyone in shock. Basically it got me thinking, do residents have a say in what gets placed in the space?
Only a restaurant or bar or chain will be able to afford that rent.
It would really suck if it was a Qdoba.
Dan
I had posted yesterday that the space is on loopnet.com for 20k and people started tweeting about it, everyone in shock. Basically it got me thinking, do residents have a say in what gets placed in the space?
Only a restaurant or bar or chain will be able to afford that rent.
It would really suck if it was a Qdoba.
Dan
no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 09:44 pm (UTC)20k a month
Date: 2009-10-08 09:47 pm (UTC)www.loopnet.com
I think that is really high, but maybe I am really out of things.
Dan
Davis Sq. is a popular location.
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 09:47 pm (UTC)Rental Rate:$25 /SF/Year
Min. Divisible:10,000 SF
Max. Contiguous:12,750 SF
My math says $26,562.50 per month for the whole space.
THAT'S NUTS.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 09:49 pm (UTC)and not pay so much for a car loan.
yah!
#
no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 10:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 09:56 pm (UTC)Or, it may be that they'll get what they're asking for and the tenant will be a success, in which case, clearly what the landlord is asking isn't as unreasonable as it seems.
I see nothing wrong with another restaurant in Davis Square. If it's a chain and you don't want chains, don't patronize it. (And depending on what it is I may join you in not patronizing it.) If the neighborhood really doesn't want that chain, it won't get enough customers to stay there.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 10:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 10:02 pm (UTC)Organized effectively, citizens could boycott an undesired tenant or could influence the government to use legal tools against it. With enough momentum, a rent control law could be promulgated. That's easily enough said! It would be a very tough battle, starting with recruiting a mass of people who agree with you and care enough to act. Not impossible, though!
Personally, I wouldn't be optimistic for such a movement in Davis Square, which has been allowed to "grow" so much already. But just because the owner is asking for $20k per month, it doesn't follow that a tenant necessarily exists that's willing to pay it. Anyone against gentrification can take heart in that consequence of the "free market". :)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 10:07 pm (UTC)Yes, that's too much to charge, and they'll have to adjust the price to something the market can bear.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:A variety of simple ways to choose the business that rents that space
Date: 2009-10-08 10:02 pm (UTC)Alternatively, come up with $20,000 a month, rent it yourself, and then sublease the property below cost to the business you would like.
If you don't approve of the business that winds up there, feel free to ignore it. Or, I don't know, picket. "Hey Hey, Ho Ho, QDoba Offends My Aesthetic Sensibilities" makes a lovely chant.
Re: A variety of simple ways to choose the business that rents that space
Date: 2009-10-08 10:06 pm (UTC)Re: A variety of simple ways to choose the business that rents that space
From:Re: A variety of simple ways to choose the business that rents that space
From:Re: A variety of simple ways to choose the business that rents that space
From:Re: A variety of simple ways to choose the business that rents that space
From:Re: A variety of simple ways to choose the business that rents that space
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 10:20 pm (UTC)I'm not sure if this partnership still exists, specifically The Lowell Plan. I know the City works closely with the SBAC on programs for small business owners in Lowell.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 01:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 10:40 pm (UTC)Even Bowl and Board felt like it kind of rattled in there, I think (although a shrinking inventory due to bankruptcy may have something to do with it; when their store was on Mass Ave they didn't have such problems with filling space).
no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 10:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 10:45 pm (UTC)Does this mean Bowl & Board can move back to their previous location, since it is STILL vacant since they left ever so long ago?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-08 11:19 pm (UTC)Communities do/can control what businesses are welcome
Date: 2009-10-08 11:42 pm (UTC)For example, I would be surprised if the city licensed another full-on bar in that space. If this were Salem, it would be surprising if a Gap would be allowed in that space- or a Trader Joe's, for that matter.
So communities do and can control these things. Davis Sq. doesn't have a great track record though - there seems little sensitivity to directing how the village develops, aside from the issue of liqueur licenses/closing hours. Ex: the street level of One Davis Square is a disaster - that should never have been approved. The planned development at the corner of Summer + Cutter that is under way does not look like it will be "good" for the community.
But your miles + values may vary. It would be a shame if DS goes the way of Harvard Sq.
Re: Communities do/can control what businesses are welcome
Date: 2009-10-09 12:43 am (UTC)Licensing has more flexibility, but generally applies only to bars and restaurants.
Re: Communities do/can control what businesses are welcome
From:Re: Communities do/can control what businesses are welcome
From:Re: Communities do/can control what businesses are welcome
From:Re: Communities do/can control what businesses are welcome
From:Re: Communities do/can control what businesses are welcome
From:Re: Communities do/can control what businesses are welcome
From:Harvard Square
Date: 2009-10-09 12:35 am (UTC)The rent just seems crazy to me, and I hate to think that it will be a string of businesses going in and then closing a little while after. I know the bookstore said the rent was the reason why they left.
I just don't want Davis to become Harvard Sq., that's all.
Re: Harvard Square
Date: 2009-10-09 02:09 am (UTC)Re: Harvard Square
From:Re: Harvard Square
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 03:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 05:15 am (UTC)I reluctantly agree, and it bothers me. Davis Sq. used to have a greater variety of shops; now its mostly banks and eateries (and that reminds me of what Harvard Sq. has become).
davis vs. union
Date: 2009-10-09 01:40 pm (UTC)Hello Harvard Square! It's official.
Guess Union will become the new Davis.
Re: davis vs. union
Date: 2009-10-09 03:23 pm (UTC)I can't really get upset about this. The space was built to be Somerset Savings Bank's headquarters office, not retail. It stood empty for years after USTrust bought Somerset and then Citizens bought USTrust. An architecture firm leased it as overflow office space for a year or two, but then it became empty again.
Re: davis vs. union
From:Re: davis vs. union
From:Re: davis vs. union
From:Re: davis vs. union
From:Re: davis vs. union
From:Re: davis vs. union
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 03:36 pm (UTC)From what Ron mentioned the space had been empty for years(?) at some point, which could sadly indicate that the owners are not desperate to have it rented right away.
But I'm pretty sure the City can put some pressure on the owners, cause empty storespace is not good for anyone. Just don't make it a burrito place. Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 04:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 05:03 pm (UTC)a) Speak with your alderman.
b) Call or write to the building's owners, the Gorin family, to express your concerns:
GRA
255 Elm St
Somerville, MA 02144-2956
(617) 623-0551
Those are the things you can do.
Meh...
Date: 2009-10-09 11:53 pm (UTC)Re: Meh...
Date: 2009-10-10 04:09 am (UTC)keeping it local
Date: 2009-10-16 02:06 am (UTC)That is great, and keeps me hopeful for the future of this space and the square.