![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
wardv.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
davis_squareGoogle has announced it is going to build a real broadband network to test ultra-high speed applications and networks. They intend to provide service to at least 50,000 and possibly up to 500,000 people. It will be a fiber to the home network with speeds over 1 gigabit/second.
That's way, way, way faster than anything commonly considered 'broadband' in the US. It's on par with speeds residential users can get in parts of the most advanced broadband nation in the world - Japan. If you like statistics and want to see how pathetic the broadband situation is in the US, the OECD has a ton of numbers on this topic.
Google is going to build this as an open access network. That means they will own the fiber but they will share access to that fiber with many ISPs. Users will be able to sign up for service with an ISP of their choice, which will then presumably handle all billling and pay Google a share of proceeds for the use of the fiber.
DSL used to be operated in a similar way in the US. That changed when our regulators and legislators rolled over and allowed incumbent telephone companies (Verizon and co) to kill off most of the companies they had to share phone lines with. The incumbents did that largely by pricing the alternative ISPs (CLECs) out of business: they charge them higher wholesale prices than what they charge their own DSL end users.
So, assuming that Google does the right thing with this new fiber (as in, does not undercut or sabotage competitor ISPs that share its fiber), and/or regulators and legislators get the guts and sense to actually enforce open access on all access networks, this announcement is really good news for broadband competition.
Getting back to the point of this post - Google's looking for state, county and city officials who want their communities to participate in this project. Google's also asking non-officials to nominate their communties.
I would love to see Somerville be part of this. If you feel the same way, please join me in nominating Somerville.
Does anyone know who would be the best person at the City to talk to about this? Getting the city of Somerville officially interested would obviously be helpful.
That's way, way, way faster than anything commonly considered 'broadband' in the US. It's on par with speeds residential users can get in parts of the most advanced broadband nation in the world - Japan. If you like statistics and want to see how pathetic the broadband situation is in the US, the OECD has a ton of numbers on this topic.
Google is going to build this as an open access network. That means they will own the fiber but they will share access to that fiber with many ISPs. Users will be able to sign up for service with an ISP of their choice, which will then presumably handle all billling and pay Google a share of proceeds for the use of the fiber.
DSL used to be operated in a similar way in the US. That changed when our regulators and legislators rolled over and allowed incumbent telephone companies (Verizon and co) to kill off most of the companies they had to share phone lines with. The incumbents did that largely by pricing the alternative ISPs (CLECs) out of business: they charge them higher wholesale prices than what they charge their own DSL end users.
So, assuming that Google does the right thing with this new fiber (as in, does not undercut or sabotage competitor ISPs that share its fiber), and/or regulators and legislators get the guts and sense to actually enforce open access on all access networks, this announcement is really good news for broadband competition.
Getting back to the point of this post - Google's looking for state, county and city officials who want their communities to participate in this project. Google's also asking non-officials to nominate their communties.
I would love to see Somerville be part of this. If you feel the same way, please join me in nominating Somerville.
Does anyone know who would be the best person at the City to talk to about this? Getting the city of Somerville officially interested would obviously be helpful.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 03:18 am (UTC)As to SCAT ... uh ... maybe in a more activist/involved community, community access TV makes sense but SCAT is an embarrassment. The only thing I recall watching of any worth is that strange woman doing the monthly interview show with a weirdly wooden Mike Capuano and long ago a cooking show with a tall Asian guy. Otherwise it is really pathetic, wannabe white "hip hop" fanboyz, Scientology promos, and (for balance I guess...) the wooden woman from 'Democracy Now." A few other feeble attempts (some arts interview thing, etc.).
Community access should not be a condition (even though the costs overall are likely trivial)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 03:35 am (UTC)SCAT runs lots of different programming at different times of day -- check their schedule online. If you don't like what they show, go volunteer to help produce something else -- they are open to anyone who lives in Somerville.
(And what is a more 'activist/involved' community than Somerville?)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 05:11 am (UTC)A more activist/involved community might be Cambridge (or any borough in NYC).
SCAT is a joke. Sort of negative ferment... (+ community payoff for RCN).
As to my being involved - I am busy with other things and have no interest in learning how to do mass media type stuff. Why don't YOU get involved. You would be great! I would like to see what you might come up with.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 09:35 pm (UTC)Come to think of it, not sure why there needs to be community TV (or any TV at all) now that we have the internet, except that I guess bandwidth needs to improve.