![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I went to last night's neighborhood meeting on the subject of Sacco's Bowl-Haven and Flatbread Company. The meeting took place in Sacco's (noisy) pool hall, and lasted about an hour. On hand were JP Sacco (co-owner of Bowl-Haven), John Meehan (Flatbread co-founder), Peter Quinn (architect), Rich DiGirolamo (lawyer) and Rebekah Gewirtz (Ward 6 alderman).
Meehan proposes to convert the pool hall into a pizza restaurant seating about 125. He would keep the rightmost 10 of the current 15 bowling lanes. The leftmost 5 lanes would become a bar seating about 28 people, plus food preparation and storage areas. They will apply for a full liquor license, which could be either an existing unused license or one of several newly authorized by the state legislature in a home-rule petition. They promise to close by midnight each day, and not to request a 2 am closing in the future.
This use of an existing building is allowed as of right in the Central Business District zone. It still needs to go before the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals because the new use requires 6 more parking spaces than the (grandfathered) existing use. Since the building covers nearly 100% of its lot area, there is no possibility of providing such parking on site. The liquor license requires a public hearing before the Licensing Commission.
( Read more... )
Meehan proposes to convert the pool hall into a pizza restaurant seating about 125. He would keep the rightmost 10 of the current 15 bowling lanes. The leftmost 5 lanes would become a bar seating about 28 people, plus food preparation and storage areas. They will apply for a full liquor license, which could be either an existing unused license or one of several newly authorized by the state legislature in a home-rule petition. They promise to close by midnight each day, and not to request a 2 am closing in the future.
This use of an existing building is allowed as of right in the Central Business District zone. It still needs to go before the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals because the new use requires 6 more parking spaces than the (grandfathered) existing use. Since the building covers nearly 100% of its lot area, there is no possibility of providing such parking on site. The liquor license requires a public hearing before the Licensing Commission.