Following up
Mar. 31st, 2011 04:00 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
So, the end state of the cities fine accounting system is that (a) writing "water bill" on the check is NOT sufficient to guarantee the funds go to pay the water bill, (b) about half of that check went to my 3rd (not due when I paid the check) and 4th quarter (not due, even now) real estate taxes, while unpaid water bill earned the city interest, and (c) they claim state regulations dictate the procedures, so not their fault.
Summary of their response:
They are sorry, it was a wacky edge case, but they are not allowed (by state law) to refund interest charges, or pay interest on a credit kept in one account, while the other account *for the same property* charges me interest. If I don't like it, I can take it up with the attorney general's office. Even if I did "waste my time" pursuing it, the most they would have to pay back is 8%.
As it is under $100, not worth fighting city hall.
Summary of their response:
They are sorry, it was a wacky edge case, but they are not allowed (by state law) to refund interest charges, or pay interest on a credit kept in one account, while the other account *for the same property* charges me interest. If I don't like it, I can take it up with the attorney general's office. Even if I did "waste my time" pursuing it, the most they would have to pay back is 8%.
As it is under $100, not worth fighting city hall.