I thought I would run this by the community, and perhaps a real estate agent or lawyer will have some background to share. We recently had an offer accepted on a condo near Porter, and after the offer was accepted, while checking online, discovered that the unit had previous lead paint inspections that found violations, apparently during the previous owner's watch.
The current sellers and their agent had specifically indicated there were no disclosures. Our understanding is that according to the law they had to disclose to us the results of the lead tests. It seems that either the previous owner failed to disclose the results to them (and they didn't try hard to find the public record on their building), or they knew about the tests but failed to disclose them to us; in either case, it seems someone was breaking the rules.
We have decided not to purchase the condo, but wonder if there is something we can do to help ensure that such lead paint violations are disclosed.
Any experiences with this would be of interest.
The current sellers and their agent had specifically indicated there were no disclosures. Our understanding is that according to the law they had to disclose to us the results of the lead tests. It seems that either the previous owner failed to disclose the results to them (and they didn't try hard to find the public record on their building), or they knew about the tests but failed to disclose them to us; in either case, it seems someone was breaking the rules.
We have decided not to purchase the condo, but wonder if there is something we can do to help ensure that such lead paint violations are disclosed.
Any experiences with this would be of interest.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 02:55 pm (UTC)I am not positive at all, but I think most disclosures are voluntary, so unless they specifically said the place had be deleaded I don't know if they did anything illegal.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:03 pm (UTC)We found the inspections logged at: http://webapps.ehs.state.ma.us/Leadsafehomes/default.aspx
And the report indicated:
Violations Found, At the time of inspection there were lead hazard found on the property....
(and yes, it seems this applies mainly to when children <6 live there)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:08 pm (UTC)maybe the owner ate a lot of paint chips and the brain damage made them forget about the violation?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:13 pm (UTC)I would contact the real estate agent's firm and the Mass Realtors Association (http://marealtor.com/content/) (if the agent is a member) to express concern that the agent may have broken the law by knowing about lead in the home and not telling you.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:19 pm (UTC)Sadly, they can probably say that the previous owner who got the lead inspection done didn't tell *them*, which is why they didn't tell *you*, regardless of whether that's true or not, and as civil penalties, you'd have to sue them, I think.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 04:14 pm (UTC)Of course, there are other reasons to hire realtors too, many of them good reasons.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:48 pm (UTC)The official reports are all done on the same state-designed form and are actually fairly helpful in understanding your situation. We had one that the seller had done on our house, and we were able to use it to get quotes on remediation, which could then inform the price we were willing to pay for the house.
ANY oldish house in MA
Date: 2010-05-03 04:18 pm (UTC)Re: ANY oldish house in MA
Date: 2010-05-04 12:46 am (UTC)Re: ANY oldish house in MA
Date: 2010-05-04 02:20 pm (UTC)Re: ANY oldish house in MA
Date: 2010-05-04 02:25 pm (UTC)I mean, sure, we will *also* be able to disclose that the house is known-abated when someday we sell, and if we'd been more on the ball we could've gotten some government aid on the deleading, but that isn't actually the point.
Re: ANY oldish house in MA
Date: 2010-05-04 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 07:33 pm (UTC)it sucks that it is so incredibly expensive to delead
no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 10:06 pm (UTC)There are grants and loan programs to help with the cost, depending on your income. Also, it can be cheaper to encapsulate (cover the lead paint with special encapsulating paint) than strip.
You may be surprised to find out how *little* of your house has lead paint. When I had mine tested, it was just the trim in the living room and the walls in the kitchen.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-04 02:02 am (UTC)as noted below, i'm afraid of finding out and it being everywhere. even 7K is more than we can really afford right now.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-04 02:28 pm (UTC)So, the ancapsulating paint
Date: 2010-05-04 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-04 12:49 am (UTC)Of course you never know until you test, and if you do test you may find that everything is coated in lead, and then you're hosed, so as long as your kids aren't showing up positive for lead I totally get where you're coming from.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-04 02:03 am (UTC)If you don't have young kids...
Date: 2010-05-04 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 03:42 pm (UTC)I talked with health and human services who run the web site with the report I found, and they were not surprised the disclosure rules can be gotten around. As was mentioned above, it seems that while there is a law to encourage disclosure of inspections, and even though clearly either the previous or current owners didn't comply, that in practice it is not easy to do something about it. There is a $10k civil penalty, but you would have to sue to pursue that.
This wasn't a make or break issue for us, but it would have been nice to know beforehand, and we might not have gone forward with the inspection, etc.
I was also a little surprised our buyers agent didn't at least point us to this resource... For other buyers, it's an easy thing to check here: http://webapps.ehs.state.ma.us/Leadsafehomes/default.aspx