I clearly must be bored, to be opening up this particular can of worms. OTOH, the article includes a phone number you can call any time you want to complain about it, which will be infinitely more fruitful than complaining about it here: "Massport’s noise complaint line is 617-561-3333."
Time to stop the buzzing
ETA: Since some folks argue that calling Massport is just as fruitless as complaining here, here's another number to call for folks who are indeed interested in knowing about the airplane noise you are experiencing: "You can help us by also reporting the disturbance to 311. The statistics you provide will be an important weapon is[sic] our ongoing campaign."
Time to stop the buzzing
ETA: Since some folks argue that calling Massport is just as fruitless as complaining here, here's another number to call for folks who are indeed interested in knowing about the airplane noise you are experiencing: "You can help us by also reporting the disturbance to 311. The statistics you provide will be an important weapon is[sic] our ongoing campaign."
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:07 pm (UTC)I’m not sure this is a battle that really can be won, or that the city should spend significant time, energy, or money on it. If we somehow divert the flights from being over Somerville, won’t that just push the problem over to Jamaica Plain or Chelsea or some other equally undeserving community?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 08:02 pm (UTC)I usually use "obfuscation" for that, but yours has more syllables. :-)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:31 pm (UTC)On the positive, because of runway work this past summer, I've had only very few noise filled days.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-06 03:13 am (UTC)I also asked if complaint data was used to determine if a city or region could apply for MassPort's noise abatement program and was told no and neither Somerville nor Medford (where I live) were cities that could get into that program.
Why not? And why do people accept "no" for this kind of question, particularly since it is based on lies to begin with?
Thanks to the mayor for at least trying.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-06 02:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-06 02:46 pm (UTC)When I asked why do folks accept "no" for this kind of question, I did not mean "why did you accept no when you called" (though, again, I can see where you saw that, sorry for not being more clear), I meant more collectively, why is "no" allowed to be an answer?
I wrote an entry here recently, talking about the bus service that failed last weekend leaving folks stranded for hours in Davis Square during a snow storm. I have called several times at this point, and have refused to accept the answer that there are not enough resources for folks to do their jobs. This was a gross oversight and not acceptable. There *are* resources; they simply did not use them to get the job done because, as she said, the system is not set up that way. It should be. I gave her my complaint number and told her I wanted a call back when a decision on the matter that they are revisiting is reached. It does not sound like you could do that in that one situation, but the complacence of folks to accept this sort of thing is a bit pathological and it gets to me. And sometimes I am complacent, too. Gets to me there as well.
Thank you for being an example of fighting that complacency. I think what you have done is terrific and if more folks did it in numbers, we could see some change.
To answer your question, I have done nothing. I am not affected by the noise most of the time, probably partly because I have some hearing problems that weirdly come and go, so I don't actually hear everything in the ways folks would without these problems might (I said most of the time because I do recall hearing it once, I don't recall when that was or where in Somerville I was at that moment).
Unlike other folks who are unsympathetic because they are not adversely affected and have little use for folks who are, I am quite aware of how disruptive loud noise can be (I am not immune to all of them by any stretch--just don't have a problem personally with the planes), having had to bear it on occasion when I did not live in Somerville. In fact, my partner and I have had serious arguments over it in the past--he feels like folks who don't want loud noise should not live in the city, and I don't believe it is anywhere nearly as easy as that. Folks do not always have the capacity to move, for whatever health, economic, or other logistical reasons. All that aside? Folks thought of this issue, promises were made, and they are not being kept--I might think folks were laughing about what they got away with, except that it does not seem to register enough even to warrant laughter. From reading the entry from Mr. Champion from last year, it seems that that Massport and the FAA dont' even have to *hear* the complaints--they simply refuse to listen and get away with it. My question was in my mind, "why is no an ok answer for them to give after such promises were made, which were clearly never intended to be honored".
Please accept my apologies. I wish more folks were as proactive.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 02:20 pm (UTC)I agree, it's too easy to be complacent or just complain about things, thing is this will have a long term effect on the community and needs to be resolved as soon as possible, as other people will come into office and not have the first hand knowledge of what was promised and the issue will just be lost.
I'm so glad we have someone in a power position who is taking a stand on this issue.