![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I really hope they follow through with the green line extension because this will be awesome.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8Cf6TMS5dYI
It appears Ball Sq is the only stop that they did this 3D rendering for.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8Cf6TMS5dYI
It appears Ball Sq is the only stop that they did this 3D rendering for.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 01:28 am (UTC)Could you tell from the video if that's on top of the stealth bowling alley and little garage that are there? Or on the other side? I am bad with orientation, apparently.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 01:32 am (UTC)http://www.somervillestep.org/map/
no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 03:54 am (UTC)Unless they're starting work soon and then taking their sweet time about it.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 02:54 pm (UTC)Everyone there: That's a giant clusterfuck of an intersection. We don't want the station there. Please put it in Ball Square.
Planners: But we can't put it in Ball Square, we'd have to demolish the local business there.
Community: You mean that run down auto body shop and bowling alley that's never open? We want them gone! They're eyesores! We've been trying to get rid of them for years!
Planners: You sure?
Community: Yes! Tear them down! Two birds with one stone!
And so it came to be...
no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 10:28 pm (UTC)and yet, they really won the luck lottery on this one, if the planners plan to pay them anything like market rate for their property.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 04:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 10:16 pm (UTC)The T insisted that there be no at-grade crossing of the tracks anywhere on the extension, despite the fact that there are tons of at-grade crossings elsewhere on the line. This adds hundreds of millions of dollars to the cost, but apparently the MBTA said it was non-negotiable.
("At-grade" means walking/driving across the tracks, as opposed to a bridge or a tunnel or some other way of crossing the tracks.)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 10:58 pm (UTC)If not, then people coming from the east will have to walk down the hill on Broadway, then go up the escalator to the turnstiles, then down the other escalator to the platform.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-15 02:44 am (UTC)I also wonder if there is some farther-future thinking at play. The green line light rail cars may eventually get replaced with real subway, some far off day. Then at-grade crossings would be a real issue, and all the new stations being built for the extension would need to be majorly redesigned. The way it's planned now, you can imagine it not taking a lot of renovation to turn it into a track, station, and platform combo compatible with a normal subway car.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-15 06:53 pm (UTC)And it's also possible to have grade crossings on a subway, or frequent electrified commuter rail line, even with third rail.
If this project weren't so expensive because of these constraints (a billion dollars for 5 miles), it would be easier to build more rail lines in the future.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 08:50 pm (UTC)track widening
Date: 2011-11-15 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-15 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-25 08:00 pm (UTC)