Rules Are Coming
Jul. 27th, 2005 09:31 amThe number of advertisements in serious need of being <lj-cut> is getting out of hand in this community. I'm considering making a rule that all ads for anything must be <lj-cut>, just to make administration easier. This community never really has had the rules spelled out, I have just relied on people understanding etiquette. However, as with offline etiquette, online etiquette seems to be a thing of the past. So it is about time that the rules be spelt out. Sometime later today, probably this evening, I will post a list of rules for the community and add them to the profile.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 02:12 pm (UTC)It should be the rule for all huge photos/graphics.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 02:31 pm (UTC)Personally, I wish advertisements weren't allowed here, but instead in a "Davis Square Nonsense" community, created for people to hawk their events.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 02:48 pm (UTC)Take away all "advertisement" and we'd remove easily 60% of the community traffic. Heck, if you threw in a prohibition on politics as well, we'd be down to "I <3 DAVIS SO MUCH" posts.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 05:09 pm (UTC)I did not say that those didn't have a place. I do not believe that place is here.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 05:58 pm (UTC)My point is simply this - there will always be something else that someone finds annoying. Frankly, I find the (often repeated) apartment/roommates wanted posts far more annoying than "adverstisements" about events or entertainment. They are, however, useful to some members of the community. If we're allowing those, I see no reason not to allow other things of interest to the community to be posted.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 06:50 pm (UTC)My position is that the infiltration of advertisements into a community forum changes its nature, be that for good or ill. I find a LJ community centered on a physical space -- be it a college campus or neighborhood -- to be a virtual discussion, one where people can discuss the content and spirit of the tangible location. My assumption is that dialectic is our communal foundation -- that is, that we're here because we want to engage with each other.
Advertisements, while informative, do not inspire discussion. Perhaps meta-discussion, such as ours, but rarely do people debate and offer insight into the event itself. That is why I am arguing for a separate space for that sort of post: a place where discussion is not expected.
To offer a metaphor, one does not walk into a coffee shop and plaster the walls with fliers, nor does one stand by a bulletin board with the expectation that people are there to do more than simply read what is hanging there. Both are equally valuable, but attempting one in the space reserved for the other will generally annoy people.
I concede that apartment listings should probably sit on an announcement board. However, I would rather that the rule be "a post is valid -here- if it is intended to generate discussion", which would exclude posts intended to gain attendance at something. Discretion of interpretation would have to be left to the moderator, of course.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 07:14 pm (UTC)I like
'Course, while I'd argue against compartmentalization, it's really up to the mods what happens. Just have to say what the rules set says...
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 09:17 pm (UTC)That said, it seems like we do understand each other, and still differ in position. No sweat -- that's why we have moderators -and- the ability to create our own communities.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 06:09 pm (UTC)