Gentrification
Mar. 7th, 2014 10:32 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Paul McMorrow writes about gentrification in Union Square. He notes that with the arrival of the Green Line, it will be much more desirable to live in. This will cause an increase in demand for housing there, and that there are two choices: Allow enough additional housing to be built to prevent prices from rising insanely, or preserve its "character" (appearance) at the cost of pricing out just about everybody who already lives there.
"Desirable, inexpensive, low-density -- choose any two!"
"Desirable, inexpensive, low-density -- choose any two!"
no subject
Date: 2014-03-07 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-07 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-07 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-08 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-08 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-10 03:12 pm (UTC)But there's a subtle class effect, too. "that popsicle stick" -- above a certain class level, you're not allowed to eat things on the street. Indeed, as you get richer, you live less of your life on the street, and so you generate less trash on the street. If you're rich enough, you exit the building's door, cross the side walk, and enter the chauffeured vehicle... not much opportunity to litter there!
And homeowners are generally a lot more sensitive to the appearance of their property and their neighbors' properties than are renters, because it directly affects the value of their most valuable asset.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-10 05:50 pm (UTC)Or, "I don't care about the condition of my neighborhood because I'm a renter, therefore my littering should be condoned, or else you're a classist."
no subject
Date: 2014-03-10 08:47 pm (UTC)