Election poll - Governor of Massachusetts
Jul. 16th, 2014 05:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The primary election for Governor of Massachusetts, as well as other statewide and district offices, is only eight weeks away: Tuesday, September 9.
If the election were held today, for whom would you vote?
(Note: like our previous polls in DSLJ, this is not a secret ballot; individual votes are readable by all members of the community)
[Poll #1975440]
I have not listed independent candidates here because they will not be on the September 9 primary ballot, and we don't know who they all are yet (the filing deadline is July 29). But if you support one, tell us in the comments.
All discussion about the state election (for Governor or any other office) is welcome here. I'll probably post a second poll when we get closer to the primary and more folks are paying attention.
If the election were held today, for whom would you vote?
(Note: like our previous polls in DSLJ, this is not a secret ballot; individual votes are readable by all members of the community)
[Poll #1975440]
I have not listed independent candidates here because they will not be on the September 9 primary ballot, and we don't know who they all are yet (the filing deadline is July 29). But if you support one, tell us in the comments.
All discussion about the state election (for Governor or any other office) is welcome here. I'll probably post a second poll when we get closer to the primary and more folks are paying attention.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-16 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-16 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-16 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-17 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-17 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-17 02:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-17 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-17 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-18 04:25 am (UTC)Not offhand, but I'll post here a list of the candidates' websites, which may be helpful to you or others:
no subject
Date: 2014-07-18 03:01 pm (UTC)Don Berwick covers fairness and justice (more active role of government in promoting), addressing climate change, universal pre-K and more funding for public education, and health care (single payer, lower costs and better care, get from 99% to 100% insured).;
Martha Coakley has a less-specific but otherwise similar agenda: more health care access (but not a specific goal or method of achieving it), more affordable education, etc.
Mark Fisher is opposed to tolls, taxes, immigrants, and Democrats. Quixotic. Nice mustache.
Steve Grossman is somewhat more wonkish. Climate change and carbon. Earned sick time. Promoting vo-tech and STEM education, 'treating constituents like the valued customers of a business'
no subject
Date: 2014-07-18 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-23 06:26 am (UTC)Climate change isn't the only example of that, either. Did these candidates accidentally fail to realize that this year's election is for Governor, not Senator?
no subject
Date: 2014-07-23 12:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-23 09:23 pm (UTC)What gubernatorial candidates should do is focus on positions about what they will do for the state, rather than "feel good" but ineffectual positions about what might be good for the U.S. or the world as a whole.
If they want to do things for the U.S. as a whole, they should run for Senator instead. If they want to do things for the world as a whole, they should try to get appointed ambassador.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-23 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-23 10:45 pm (UTC)Building coastal barriers might make sense, but that doesn't seem to be what they're campaigning on.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-23 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-25 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-24 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-24 08:13 pm (UTC)California could impact emissions on cars nationwide in the same way Texas influences school textbooks. They are such a large portion of the US population that when they change standards, it's easier for manufacturers to implement the change for everyone than to have different products for different states. Massachusetts doesn't have that kind of clout. If we had been the ones who raised emissions standards, we would have just have to pay a lot more money for special cars and aftermarket solutions.
While I don't like psychohist's style of argument I think they are essentially right. If you enact strict regulations in Massachusetts, it's going to make things expensive here while not even touching climate change since we are 0.09% of the world's population. It will lead to less residents and businesses wanting to reside in Massachusetts. Change has to come at the national and worldwide level. I'm optimistic that as the younger generations comes into power, it will.
If we're talking about preparing Massachusetts for the impact of climate change, then that's great. If we're talking about incentives to bring the companies building tomorrow's energy solutions, that's great, too. But I get the feeling that this candidate is mostly talking about reducing emissions, and it's a ploy to get votes from people who feel strongly about this issue (which I'm sure we all do here). There are a lot of issues impacting the state that the governor can actually impact, and I'm personally going to vote based on those.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-25 05:10 am (UTC)