Continuing The Discussion on Trader Joe's
Jan. 26th, 2006 04:10 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Sometime last week there was brief mention of desire (which I'm sure most of us share) for a Trader Joe's in Davis. Someone here, and I don't remember who, had information on that and said that Trader Joe's rejected Davis as a location because of the lack of parking. I've been thinking about that, and I'm wondering if that person, or anyone, has more information on how the company was approached or how they arrived at their decision.
If it's strictly a parking matter, one need only look at the Boylston Street store to know it can and does succeed with minimal-to-no parking.
Joe's has parking-lotted stores in Cambridge and Arlington. Yet they have not one store in Manhattan. Are they really that afraid of areas with low cars-to-residents ratios? Could it be that when they were asked about a Davis location, they simply didn't know the demographics of this neighborhood and presumed there would be no support or interest? A Davis location would be a goldmine for them, we all know that. But it would appear they don't.
So my questions:
Is there an appropriately sized space for them available? Who owns it?
We know the pros, but would there be any cons to their being here?
And, could an online petition with several thousand signatures from ethusiastic area residents who would be regular customers have enough positive influence to make them think again?
Curious for your thoughts...
If it's strictly a parking matter, one need only look at the Boylston Street store to know it can and does succeed with minimal-to-no parking.
Joe's has parking-lotted stores in Cambridge and Arlington. Yet they have not one store in Manhattan. Are they really that afraid of areas with low cars-to-residents ratios? Could it be that when they were asked about a Davis location, they simply didn't know the demographics of this neighborhood and presumed there would be no support or interest? A Davis location would be a goldmine for them, we all know that. But it would appear they don't.
So my questions:
Is there an appropriately sized space for them available? Who owns it?
We know the pros, but would there be any cons to their being here?
And, could an online petition with several thousand signatures from ethusiastic area residents who would be regular customers have enough positive influence to make them think again?
Curious for your thoughts...
no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 09:37 pm (UTC)"A Davis Square location would be a goldmine for them, we all know that. But it would appear they don't."
You obviously have a lucrative career ahead of you! WHy not go to work for them and set them straight?
Seriously though, there are a LOT more factors than simply parking. The population is a lot denser on Boylston St. than in Davis Sq., for example. Then factor in taxes, permits, zoning, rent, and competition, and put THAT on top of the parking.
By the way, Trader Joes is finally moving into NYC this calendar year, their first store is being built as we we speak in the Union Sq. area.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 10:31 pm (UTC)Wow, we haven't had any raging caustic assholery around here since the old Mod left! Thanks for the trip down memory lane.
I posted this for open discussion, and I *never* said I knew better than anyone else about the issue. You're more than welcome to state a contrary opinion, to me or anyone else, but you're going to do it in a civil manner without flames or you're not going to do it at all. The old mod was run out of here for hostility just like yours, and that kind of flaming isn't welcome here.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 12:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 09:57 pm (UTC)It probably would be worth it to them, but they may reason that Davis is close enough to the Arlington (on the bus line) or Cambridge locations that it may take too much business away from them to be worth it.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 10:56 pm (UTC)I'm pretty sure the open part of the ground floor is way too small for a TJ's.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 01:12 am (UTC)or whatever they are today), a Trader Joes, and a few other markets.
I know that I'm annoyed that I have to go to cambridge to get my groceries.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 10:34 pm (UTC)I believe that a TJ will benefit folks not just in Davis Square, but possibly many many others north of the river who live near the Redline. It is simply a pain the butt to go all the way to Boylston for TJ, or hop on a bus/drive to other TJ locations (that I know of). TJ in Davis Sq means convenience to people without cars, near the Redline. That's a lot of people, and ought to be a huge incentive to the marketing team of TJ.
I also agree that a paper petition would be more worthwhile, but personally, I'd be happy to sign either (or both!).
no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 10:42 pm (UTC)There is no TJs on the redline (Cambridge's is a good hike from Central as I said)...and if there were one, I'm sure people would come from the Harvard, Porter, Davis and Alewife areas.
They have one location in SoMa San Francisco; it has nominal parking, but it shares the lot with a Bed Bath and Beyond and a Toys R Us...so the net effect of available parking was, basically, kind of like they didn't have any...but they did have a bus stop rignt in front.
I also wouldn't mind getting a Super 88 in the area...I'd go there far more often than TJs!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 12:18 am (UTC)Though I'd be happy with a TJs too. And if one were to contact TJs about the suggestion, one might let slip that Somervillians were looking into starting a coop in Davis...
no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 02:31 am (UTC)It's important to emphasize that we want a grocer only to fill empty spaces, and not to displace other businesses already in the square. If a landlord reacts to our efforts by evicting a bunch of local businesses in order to combine them into a space big enough for a TJ's, we will have damaged the square rather than improving it.
Also, it's important to emphasize that we don't want to put the existing small food stores (Farmer's Bounty, MacKinnon's, Sessa's) out of business.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 06:11 pm (UTC)TJs
Date: 2006-01-29 02:24 pm (UTC)As far as pushing out existing retail tenants, getting rid of Family Dollar and McDonalds for a TJs would be fantastic -housing investors in the area would see an immediate increase in property values!
Re: TJs
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-28 03:54 am (UTC)Surely you're not implying Davis Square's foot traffic is comparable to Boylston Street.