(no subject)
Apr. 11th, 2006 09:35 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Round House
" At 36 Atherton Street between Porter and Union squares, there is round house which dates from 1856. I am fascinated by its archirecture and history and saddened by its state of direpair.
According to the Somerville Public Library, the 40-foot diameter Round House was built as a curiosity by a prominent inventor and locksmith, Enoch Robinson. It contains a glass-domed central hall and two parlors: one circular and one oval. The Somerville Old House Organization (SOHO) has a nice write up on the place, including a rare picture of the interior, seen at right. In it you can see sections of the parlor walls, which Robinson covered with a French scenic paper depicting royalty in castles, gardens, and hunting scenes. The shape of the house itself has been traced to one built in the Desert de Retz in Chambourcy, France, in 1780 and 1781 by Francois Nicolas Henri Racine de Monville (1734–1797) in the shape of a huge, round, ruined, classical column."
Here is more : Round House
Thanks for all of the replies and additional links! Here are some more intersting links about the house as well as some other Somerville historic photos Link one, house plans
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 01:52 pm (UTC)My digging leads me to believe that it should be designated as a national historic place, but that the family don't want to let it go and don't have the money to fix it.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 03:00 pm (UTC)he family don’t want to let it go and don’t have the money to fix it.
frustratingly enough, conservationists have apparently tried to get the owner’s permission to work on it several times, but the owner refuses. i wonder if the argument could be made to the city that this would be a good opportunity for the exercise of eminent domain, given that i can’t imagine the owner gains any benefit from the house in its current condition?
-steve
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 05:25 pm (UTC)I'm not certain, but it may already be designated as a Historic property at some level. Unfortunately, all that really gives in terms of protection are protections against active changes or demolitions that impact the historic character; Mother Nature is allowed to do all the demolition she likes without review. :(
And as far as money for the restoration goes, there are associations between the Roundhouse and... erm... some company that I think manufactures locks, or something like that (I should check my notes), who have expressed an interest in being involved in any restoration, should it take place.
Funky note: those "parapets" above the second floor, right above the windows? Those are for the windows themselves - which are single-hung - to go up into. The windows open all the way!
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 04:24 pm (UTC)I love the house--I really do. Some nights I have gone out of my way to drive by and park outside it for a while. But I can't help thinking the same amount of money to restore it might be more useful being dumped into our public library system, or something else. I wish someone could buy it and fix it up though. Even if it were privately owned it could be saved.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 02:51 pm (UTC)Photos of the interior
Date: 2006-04-11 03:08 pm (UTC)http://web.mit.edu/petern/www/roundhouse/
Re: Photos of the interior
Date: 2006-04-11 04:31 pm (UTC)Re: Photos of the interior
Date: 2006-04-16 10:54 pm (UTC)Re: Photos of the interior
Date: 2006-04-13 01:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-12 11:29 am (UTC)However, this kind of listing only protects the exterior against demolition or unauthorized renovation. It does nothing to protect it against neglect and abandonment.
To my knowledge, it is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Perhaps it should be, but again, this kind of listing would only provide limited protection (in this case, against any demolition or alteration using Federal funds). It also facilitates access to some historic preservation funds, and can provide tax credits -- but the property owner has to want these things.