Whee, look at all the blanks for alderman-at-large. From re-reading replies to my question yesterday about the ballots, I see that one was apparently supposed to select four aldermen-at-large, not just one... enh. I certainly failed to notice this fact when actually voting, and by the looks of things, so did several thousand other voters. Oh well.
Sometimes people vote for one candidate as a mistake. Often it's done as a strategy. If people feel that the vote will be close, they only vote for one person, thereby not boosting any would-be competition. (Called "bullet voting")
I have no idea how close the Alderman-at-Large race was perceived to be, though.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-05 06:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-05 06:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-05 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-05 07:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-05 01:22 pm (UTC)I have no idea how close the Alderman-at-Large race was perceived to be, though.