[identity profile] turil.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] davis_square
Joe Curtatone, while winning the election for mayor, was voted in by less than 8% of Somerville's human population.

Date: 2009-11-04 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hahathor.livejournal.com
The implication here is that some of the non-human population voted yesterday. Would that be animals, undead, or other?

Date: 2009-11-04 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badseed1980.livejournal.com
Hey, the undead are people too!

Date: 2009-11-04 10:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unquietsoul5.livejournal.com
Yes, we must Recognize the Rights of the Metabolically Challenged!

Date: 2009-11-04 11:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com
Also target practice.

Date: 2009-11-04 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] georgy.livejournal.com
I believe everyone should take advantage of the right to vote, but not casting a vote does not directly translate to disapproval of Joe Curtatone. What your statement implies is that only 8% of the population of Somerville actively supports Joe Curtatone as mayor. Technically, the election is only one metric for that.

Date: 2009-11-04 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aroraborealis.livejournal.com
Wait, help me understand your point. You want flora and fauna to be able to vote? If so, how do you see that working?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] trom.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 06:52 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] somertricky.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 07:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ukelele.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-05 03:46 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] halleyscomet.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 10:15 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] halleyscomet.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-05 02:24 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] halleyscomet.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-05 11:12 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-11-04 10:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unquietsoul5.livejournal.com
It could be worse.

Next Door in Cambridge we don't get to Vote for our Mayor (who is a glorified Chairperson with expense account, voted from among the members of the elected City Council). We are at the whim, in the end, to the decisions of the City Manager who is an Appointed/Contracted person that we have no legal power over even when he commits legal offenses that cost the people that live here millions in court fees.

Add in an election system that Drastically favors incumbents and you'll find that Somerville's 'rule by apathy' is at least more Democratic.

Date: 2009-11-04 07:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phoenixy.livejournal.com
In a devastating indictment of local leadership, 100% of non-human residents of Somerville did not vote for Mayor Curtatone.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] halleyscomet.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 10:16 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-11-04 06:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hrafn.livejournal.com
How did his opponent(s) fare?

Date: 2009-11-04 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] derekp.livejournal.com
Which is why only 8% of our population voted for him. What percentage of eligable voters voted for him?

Date: 2009-11-04 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hrafn.livejournal.com
Which is undoubtedly why, of those who voted, many people didn't vote for him OR a write-in candidate.

Date: 2009-11-04 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badseed1980.livejournal.com
Do you know what percentage of registered voters voted for him?

Date: 2009-11-04 06:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badseed1980.livejournal.com
It seems particularly interesting to me, because if you're not allowed to vote in an election, the fact that you didn't vote for a particular candidate in that election is meaningless. The percentage of those who COULD have voted for him and did not is more interesting and meaningful as a statistic.

Dumber mice!

From: [identity profile] moominmolly.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 07:18 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] plumtreeblossom.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 09:18 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ukelele.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-05 03:48 am (UTC) - Expand

Best Comment. Evar.

From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_mattt/ - Date: 2009-11-04 07:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: Best Comment. Evar.

From: [identity profile] badseed1980.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 08:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: Sure you can!

From: [identity profile] badseed1980.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 08:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: Sure you can!

From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 08:25 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: Sure you can!

From: [identity profile] hrafn.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 11:39 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: Felons can vote in Massachusetts

From: [personal profile] ron_newman - Date: 2009-11-04 08:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

One person one vote

From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_mattt/ - Date: 2009-11-04 08:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: One person one vote

From: [identity profile] halleyscomet.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 10:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: One person one vote

From: [personal profile] ron_newman - Date: 2009-11-04 11:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: One person one vote

From: [personal profile] ron_newman - Date: 2009-11-04 11:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: One person one vote

From: [identity profile] prunesnprisms.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-05 01:41 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: Exactly who is being excluded here?

From: [personal profile] ron_newman - Date: 2009-11-04 07:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] georgy.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 06:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] clevernonsense.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 07:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 08:27 pm (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 08:31 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fefie.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 06:29 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fefie.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 06:33 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] badseed1980.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 06:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

Stats says...

From: [identity profile] secretlyironic.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 07:00 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: Stats says...

From: [identity profile] somertricky.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 07:28 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] closetalker11.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 07:22 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-11-04 07:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] closetalker11.livejournal.com
A low turn-out in this kind of election could, to some, imply satisfaction with the standing government.

Date: 2009-11-04 07:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pierceheart.livejournal.com
And that's one way of looking at it, although, I would suggest it's more likely voter apathy.

After all, compare how many people are pissed about the parking changes vs how many are doing anything to get rid of the aldermen who allow the T&P thugs to rewrite law without legislative oversight.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] closetalker11.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 07:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-11-04 09:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blunderblunder.livejournal.com
I thought it had to do with how he was running unopposed.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] closetalker11.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 09:37 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] icecreamempress.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-04 11:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] closetalker11.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-11-05 07:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

There was an election?

Date: 2009-11-04 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nvidia99999.livejournal.com
That's why there were those people with signs all over the place. Oh well.

Date: 2009-11-05 05:35 am (UTC)
ext_243: (massachusetts)
From: [identity profile] xlerb.livejournal.com
I considered voting, but 1) Joe Curtatone was unopposed, and 2) I don't feel I understand the politics of the alderman positions and such well enough to be voting on them.

Plus, you have to use the marker

Date: 2009-11-05 02:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nvidia99999.livejournal.com
That everyone else has used. Not good these days.

The question is......

Date: 2009-11-10 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tt02144.livejournal.com
The question that will tell the tale is 'how many people who voted in the election on November 3rd voted for Joe Curtatone'. If people didn't vote you can't count them one way or another. But someone like me, who voted but marked off the Mayoral race as blank, can be counted as someone who didn't vote for or didn't support the Mayor.

Profile

davis_square: (Default)
The Davis Square Community

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78 910
11121314151617
181920212223 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 05:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios